On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Please let me know if this sounds reasonable or if you have suggestions on
> how to handle the logistics more cleanly.
It looks quite reasonable to me.
Only a bit of my code will be affected by the change, and that's code
which is just at the beg
On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> I believe a commonly accepted approach to this kind of issues is something
> like:
>
> 1. add warnings about the deprecated or changed methods, but keep the
> current behavior so code do not break, but becomes verbose when called
...
That p
On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> It's a pretty small API change, but there's a huge amount of code that needs
> to be changed in the back and lots and lots of testing that has to be done,
> so this is going to take a while.
Speaking of hydrogens, I came across a strange query (p
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Dalke wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> > It's a pretty small API change, but there's a huge amount of code that
> needs to be changed in the back and lots and lots of testing that has to be
> done, so this is going to take a while.
