[Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Gianluca Sforna
The RPM build for Fedora worked so I moved to RHEL/CentOS and got a new error: In file included from /usr/include/boost/python/to_python_indirect.hpp:10, from /usr/include/boost/python/converter/arg_to_python.hpp:10, from /usr/include/boost/python/call.hpp:15,

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
Gianluca, Which version of boost are you using? -greg On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > The RPM build for Fedora worked so I moved to RHEL/CentOS and got a new > error: > > > In file included from /usr/include/boost/python/to_python_indirect.hpp:10, >

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > Which version of boost are you using? RPMs are built against the packages in the repositories (stock+updates). Right now it means 1.41.0 for RHEL6, 1.53 for RHEL 7 (building now, will let you know how it goes) -

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Gianluca Sforna
For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this leaves us with only one platform where it fails; if we think the older boost version cannot be supported, I can just stick to an older release for EL6 On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
I'd like to have it work on EL6; that's still pretty common. I will make some time to investigate either this evening or tomorrow. Thanks for narrowing it down so much. -greg On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this lea

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Brian Kelley
I think I have seen this before in FilterCatalog, I can try to patch it for boost 1.41 but I will say that version of boost is getting pretty long in the tooth. Brian Kelley > On Apr 14, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > > I'd like to have it work on EL6; that's still pretty common

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
Under any circumstances: if we only support more recent versions we should indicate that in the CMakeLists.txt, which claims to support back to boost 1.39 with python2 and 1.45 with python3. I will take a look On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Brian Kelley wrote: > I think I have seen this befo

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Brian Kelley
The fix is buried here: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the exported defines, however I can tie it into the boost version in the FilterCatalog header file. We had initially thought th

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
That'd be awesome.. thanks. :-) On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Brian Kelley wrote: > The fix is buried here: > > https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files > > It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST > > The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the exported defines, > howev

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python 2.6 Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the RDKit? On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this leaves us > with only o

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864 has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7 installed manually. FWIW, I've attached the bootstrap.sh that I used to configure the vagrant box (clearly still a work in progress: it doesn't bring in the requirements for