ssage in a sensible manner!
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, David Cosgrove
> wrote:
> >
> > As discussed with Greg, I've tweaked
> > $RDBASE/Code/Demos/RDKit/Draw/MolDrawing.h so
Hi All,
As promised, here are my new classes for 2D molecule drawing, along with a
Qt application showing their use. There's a Word document in the tarball
giving a brief description of why I wrote them and what they do. That was
mostly something to attach to our publication approvals systsem wh
Hi Greg et al,
You can increment by one the number of large organisations still not fully
converted to RH6! It's a real pain for me as a developer. I have been
unable to build the latest few releases of Qt 5 on a RH6 machine with the
system g++4.4, for example. However, my experience developing
Hi All,
Having failed miserably to understand boost::python last week when trying
to add some new functions, I am wondering if there's a technical reason to
prefer it over swig? Given there are swig wrappings for java and c#, it
feels logical to do the python wrapping that way as well. It would r
Ok, I'm convinced. I assumed there was probably a good reason, but
sometimes it's worth asking the question just in case. I'm not anti boost,
but, as with many of their libraries I have looked at, I found the
documentation impenetrable at first reading. I will persevere.
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, 1 De
