The other thing to remember is that at room temperature and pressure, small
sulphoxides will be able to interconvert forms from R to S rapidly. It's only
when the groups on the sulphur get big enoough (or interconnected, like in a 3
or 4 member ring) that they actually can be resolved and
Another thing to be aware of is that if there are multiple valid
kekulizations that differ only in implicit hydrogen layout, RDKit will
refuse to pick one.
e.g. imidazole: "c1cncn1" will give you a "Can't kekulize mol" error,
whereas "c1c[nH]cn1" and "c1cnc[nH]1" are sanitized without a problem.
Hi Taka,
Yes, you need to sanitize every product molecule, after each step.
Best wishes,
Michal
On 7 February 2016 at 01:58, Taka Seri wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Thank you for your quick and kind response.
> I tried to sanitize mol according to your advice.
> And my code worked
Expanding a very small amount on Paolo's answer:
The general rule of thumb is that you should be able to draw a valid
conjugated Kekule structure for the molecule where the ring has 4N+2
electrons.
That works for C1=[S+]SC=N1, which produces the output SMILES c1nc[s+]s1.
-greg
On Mon, Feb 8,
On Feb 8, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Paolo Tosco wrote:
> ... there is a "ghost" atom involved in determining the sulfur chirality,
> which is the sulfur lone pair. Even if this is not in the Daylight specs, the
> lone-pair is usually treated as an implicit hydrogen, and therefore
> considered as the
Dear Andrew,
that functional group is a sulfoxide, and it is indeed chiral because
has a lone pair on the sulfur, which is pyramidal; there is a short
description here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfoxide
So it is the same (R,S) chirality you would have on a tetrahedral
carbon. The carbon
Thanks Paolo and Hannes for pointing me to sulfoxide. I am enlightened!
I assume this is something that every chemist knows, but it's not mentioned in
the Daylight SMILES documentation (or the OpenSMILES documentation), so I had
no clue. I wonder how many more cases there are like that.
Any
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:05:46 +0100
Andrew Dalke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could someone explain to this non-chemist what the chirality means
> in the following?
>
> CN[S@@](=O)C1=CC=CC=C1
>
> It comes from PubChem id 12194260 at
>
Hi!
Could someone explain to this non-chemist what the chirality means in the
following?
CN[S@@](=O)C1=CC=CC=C1
It comes from PubChem id 12194260 at
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/12194260 .
Isn't this a symmetric structure, which can't have an orientation at that
point? Even
Dear Andrew,
You can find an chemical example there:
Sorry for the noise, this is the same message as before, just with less
typos and repetitions. I couldn't help re-sending it after reading what
I had written!
Dear Andrew,
the reason why Chem.CanonSmiles("CN[S@@](=O)C1=CC=CC=C1") returns
'CN[S@@](=O)c1c1'
and
hi,
I am facing the same problem (in windows 7)
Installed rdkit in miniconda by following command
conda install -c https://conda.anaconda.org/rdkit rdkit
by conda list command it is showing
*rdkit 2015.09.2 np110py27_0rdkit*
but with
from rdkit import
Dear Andrew,
the reason why Chem.CanonSmiles("CN[S@@](=O)C1=CC=CC=C1") returns
'CN[S@@](=O)c1c1'
and Chem.CanonSmiles("CN1.[S@@]1(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1") returns
'CN[S@](=O)c1c1'
is that there is a "ghost" atom involved in determining the sulfur
chirality, which is a lone pair, which is the
13 matches
Mail list logo