Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Hankering after faster builds

Hi Greg, On 03/12/2016 13:16, Greg Landrum wrote: Builds do take a while, but there is *no way* they should be taking 2 hours unless they are running on extremely overloaded hardware. The travis builds, which include running all the tests, typically take less than 40 minutes. yes on my normal

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Hankering after faster builds

Lest my previous reply be mis-interpreted: I agree that it would be great if the builds were quicker - I end up needing to do a large number of them before each release - but I don't see much that can really be done other than removing a bunch of functionality. On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 8:42 AM,

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Hankering after faster builds

Builds do take a while, but there is *no way* they should be taking 2 hours unless they are running on extremely overloaded hardware. The travis builds, which include running all the tests, typically take less than 40 minutes. If, for some reason, you do still need to deal with this, I would

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Hankering after faster builds

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Tim Dudgeon wrote: > But since I've been working with the Release_2016_09_2 release my Docker > image builds on Docker Hub [1] are timing out as they sometimes exceed > the 2 hour limit. If I try at a quiet time I can sometimes get them to >

[Rdkit-discuss] Hankering after faster builds

Of course builds from source are never fast enough, and the RDKit one is pretty big. So far I've lived with this and made cups of coffee. But since I've been working with the Release_2016_09_2 release my Docker image builds on Docker Hub [1] are timing out as they sometimes exceed the 2 hour