Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-09-03 Thread Greg Landrum
Calling SanitizeMol() does call UpdatePropertyCache(). The function is just there for the times one doesn't want/need to do a full sanitization. On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 6:53 AM +0200, "Ling Chan" wrote: Hello Greg, Is UpdatePropertyCache "heavy"? If not, is it possible to fold it i

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-09-03 Thread Ling Chan
Hello Greg, Is UpdatePropertyCache "heavy"? If not, is it possible to fold it into SanitizeMol, so that users only need to remember the SanitizeMol function for refreshing a molecule? Thank you. Ling On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Greg Landrum wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-09-01 Thread Greg Landrum
:19 PM Subject: RE: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines To: Greg Landrum Cc: Hello All, I just inserted the test smile string as shown in the code below.  This should just test the function and not how molecule information is passed to it.  I can see that the molecular formula

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-09-01 Thread Bennion, Brian
August 31, 2016 7:49 PM To: Bennion, Brian Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Bennion, Brian > wrote: On one compute node with one thread, two reagents are combined in a synthesis function a

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-08-31 Thread Greg Landrum
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Bennion, Brian wrote: > > On one compute node with one thread, two reagents are combined in a > synthesis function and then the tertNitrogenProt function is called and the > current molecule is passed through to be searched for the tertiary nitrogen > and protonate

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-08-31 Thread Bennion, Brian
ndrum [greg.land...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:01 AM To: Bennion, Brian Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines hmm, perplexing. How about we try something simple. Instead of doing real molecules that may be propri

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-08-31 Thread Greg Landrum
molName3=molName1+'NH+_'+str(tertNHnum)+'_XO' > totalMolecules=oximeSubStructSearch(moleculeH,molName3,w_sdf,w_ > smi) > tertNHnum += 1 > else: > print "No tertiary nitrogen matches" > return(molecule,tertNHnum) > return (moleculeH,tertNHnum) > ######## > ###

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-08-30 Thread Bennion, Brian
print "No tertiary nitrogen matches" return(molecule,tertNHnum) return (moleculeH,tertNHnum) ## From: Greg Landrum [greg.land...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:41 PM To: Bennion, Brian Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Sub

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] protonating proper tertiary amines

2016-08-29 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi Brian, On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Bennion, Brian wrote: > > I have seemed to hit a wall with what seems like a simple task. > > First, I have ~9800 compounds that have a primary amine for a reaction > that I am completing in rdkit. > About 250 of those compounds have a tertiary alkylami