Hi James,

I know that my opinion might sound extreme but I had this discussion
many times (mostly regarding tautomerism which is, however, similar in
some way). The problem is, you can look at a chemical structure in
many different ways - two scenarios are:

1. What can I perceive from a chemical structure if all I have is the
pure connection table and nothing else (and maybe millions of them)
2. What can I find about a particular structure if a I can run fully
fledged quantum-mechanical calculations, do an extensive literature
search, and/or have carefully measured experimental data and
conditions (rarely in the millions :-))

So, if I deal with something like implementing RDKit, things are
probably always quite close to scenario 1, hence my suggestion to
disregard stereochemistry on these type of N atoms (you need a lot of
information from scenario 2 to even decide whether there is
stereochemistry or not). The ideal solution, of course, would be to
offer three different modes for stereo perception: "disregard",
"keep", "perceive" from 3D (I am not sure if Greg likes that :-)).  If
these three modes would be available I still would suggest to set the
default to "disregard" for 3-coordinated N because the other two modes
require that you know what you are doing and/or have full trust in
your data - otherwise you probably do more harm than good.

Best,
Markus

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, James Davidson <j.david...@vernalis.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg (and Markus, Peter, et al.),
>
>
>
> Personal opinion – my vote would be to always keep the chiral information at
> 3-valent nitrogen centres…
>
> As Peter pointed-out, there are bridgehead examples (most of which, I guess,
> will have additional carbon chiral centres – and offer diastereomeric
> considerations).
>
> There are also, I believe, some nice oxaziridine examples where the
> oxaziridine N is the only chiral centre present (interpreted from abstract
> here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C39850000998):
>
>
>
> 3,3-dimethyl (2S)-2-tert-butyloxaziridine-3,3-dicarboxylate
>
> COC(=O)C1(O[N@]1C(C)(C)C)C(=O)OC
>
>
>
> and many other examples of diastereomeric oxaziridines – where the N is a
> chiral centre – eg see http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2008.09.016
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> James
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> PLEASE READ: This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
> intended for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is
> unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
> contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it
> is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender or postmas...@vernalis.com. Email is not a
> secure method of communication and the Company cannot accept responsibility
> for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s).
> Please check this email for virus infection for which the Company accepts no
> responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please request
> a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Company.
>
> The Vernalis Group of Companies
> 100 Berkshire Place
> Wharfedale Road
> Winnersh, Berkshire
> RG41 5RD, England
> Tel: +44 (0)118 938 0000
>
> To access trading company registration and address details, please go to the
> Vernalis website at www.vernalis.com and click on the "Company address and
> registration details" link at the bottom of the page..
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to