Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Ligand conversion problem from 2D to 3D

2024-02-06 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi Amy, On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:20 PM He, Amy wrote: > > > Emre, great to hear from you. I also just wanted to say that not all > entries in ZINC can be transformed into 3D structures. We encountered a > couple of instances where the annotated stereo is nonphysical, especially > at

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Ligand conversion problem from 2D to 3D

2024-02-06 Thread He, Amy
Hi Greg, Thanks so much for your kind suggestions. That also helped with our projects! Emre, great to hear from you. I also just wanted to say that not all entries in ZINC can be transformed into 3D structures. We encountered a couple of instances where the annotated stereo is nonphysical,

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Ligand conversion problem from 2D to 3D

2024-02-06 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi Emre, Both of those compounds look like they have conflicting stereochemistry information in the ring systems, i.e. the stereo which is specified cannot actually exist. There's something else going on as well (that looks like a bug) but this is already a big enough problem. The easiest thing

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Ligand conversion problem from 2D to 3D

2024-02-06 Thread Emre Apaydın
Thank you so much for your help. I managed to convert most of the molecules from 2D to 3D, but no matter which ETKDG version, which embedding parameter I try, I cannot convert these two molecules; ZINC000101210593, ZINC000196058327. Is there an alternative feature or method I can try? I would be