[RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread holtek
Have grid-tie w/Battery back-up system under way. Due to changes beyond my control, I am now faced with the possibility of placing two MNBE cabinets underneath and to the side of inverter (Concorde batteries). I had always avoided this practice but have choice of either that or very long cable

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread Allan Sindelar
Holt, It's OK. The Code sections that prevented putting batteries under BOS equipment have to do with working clearance. You must be able to walk up to the equipment to service it, and a large enclosure of flooded batteries prevents that. GTWB systems use

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread R Ray Walters
Why does the side mounted breakers make the Midnite non compliant? Apparently I missed Robin's post on that. Or do I not want to know? Thanks, R. Walters r...@solarray.com Solar Engineer . Midnite enclosures, with the breakers on the sides, are not compliant, as Robin has acknowledged, but

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread Allan Sindelar
Ray, I don't think Robin has posted anything, it just came in a conversation we had. As I understand it, service equipment must have nothing interfering with designated working clearance, within a few inches of depth allowed. With Outback, Magnum, and Xanschneider the

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread Darryl Thayer
...@sbcglobal.net hol...@sbcglobal.net wrote: From: hol...@sbcglobal.net hol...@sbcglobal.net Subject: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement To: RE-wrenches re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Date: Friday, October 22, 2010, 11:23 AM Have grid-tie w/Battery back-up system under way. Due to changes beyond my

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread jay peltz
Hi Allan, that said it is a ETL listed device no? And in regards to Xantrex, the old DC disconnect had breakers on the side as well as the conduit box for the SW, again UL or ETL listed. Can you elaborate? jay peltz power On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Allan Sindelar wrote: Ray, I don't

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread boB Gudgel
On 10/22/2010 10:25 AM, Allan Sindelar wrote: Ray, I don't think Robin has posted anything, it just came in a conversation we had. As I understand it, service equipment must have nothing interfering with designated working clearance, within a few inches of depth allowed. With Outback, Magnum,

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread Allan Sindelar
Robin, Well, I think I got myself into trouble here. I do remember a recent conversation with you about this - I think - and this is the message I remember from that conversation - I think. Perhaps this is all in my imagination. I am getting older, certainly, so

Re: [RE-wrenches] Battery Placement

2010-10-22 Thread Allan Sindelar
Jay, the original issue wasn't about the breakers being on the side; it was about putting a battery cabinet underneath the disconnect enclosure. If the cabinet sticks out too far, it violates working clearance in the code. Allan Sindelar