Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-12 Thread Marv Dargatz
0-582-4603 www.solarwindworks.com ch...@solarwindworks.com "Proven Energy Solutions" From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-11 Thread Drake Chamberlin
Hi Randy, What are the best ways to mount the inverters to increase the output? Thanks At 06:49 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: The mounting approach can affect the delta T ambient-module temperature resulting in much higher output for groundmounts, polemounts, or rooftop arrays in windy ridges or

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Dana Brandt
*Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM *To:* RE-wrenches *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher than any discrepancy based on monitoring resolution. We have a pyranometer at the site, and Enphase reported energy

[RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Marco Mangelsdorf
, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher than any discrepancy based on monitoring resolution. We have a pyranometer at the site, and Enphase reported energy production as high as 38

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Dana Brandt
-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Westbrock *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM *To:* RE-wrenches *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Marv Dargatz
nergy Solutions" From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Marv Dargatz
t;Proven Energy Solutions" From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Randy
-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Marv Dargatz Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 3:59 PM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance Marco, Sorry, I missed that question in the previous e-mail. A couple of points about the compatibility list: 1. We include only

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread Bill Loesch
:59 PM Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance Marco, Sorry, I missed that question in the previous e-mail. A couple of points about the compatibility list: 1. We include only modules that have passed our internal math check for compatibility over the temperature range

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-10 Thread David Katz
Loesch Solar 1 - Saint Louis Solar - Original Message - *From:* Marv Dargatz mailto:mdarg...@enphaseenergy.com *To:* RE-wrenches mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org *Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 4:59 PM *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance Marco

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Mark Westbrock
The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher than any discrepancy based on monitoring resolution. We have a pyranometer at the site, and Enphase reported energy production as high as 38% higher that predicted from irradiance data, as well as 38% higher than the

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Chris Worcester
Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher than any discrepancy based on monitoring resolution. We have a pyranometer at the site, and Enphase reported

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Mark Westbrock
ch...@solarwindworks.com "Proven Energy Solutions" From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase p

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Marv Dargatz
nches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to below was much higher than any discrepancy based on monitoring resolutio

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Marv Dargatz
nches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Westbrock Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:33 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance The over-reporting of energy that Randy refers to be

[RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-06 Thread Marco Mangelsdorf
My biz partner has an Enphase system with BP Solar mods. He believes that the web-based monitoring system may be reporting on the high side as far as kWH performance over time. That is, he suspects that what he's seeing may not be accurate. Anyone out there have a similar experience?

Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase performance

2010-05-06 Thread Randy
. Randy Randy Sadewic Positive Energy Office: 505 424-1112 Cell:505 570-0137 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Marco Mangelsdorf Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:25 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: [RE-wrenches