On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:00 PM, David A. Wheeler
wrote:
> Alan Manuel Gloria:
>> > About the portability layer, I have planned the following set of API
>> > between the portability layer and the rest of (readable-discuss impl):
>> >
>> > ; the portability implements its own port objects. On R5R
Alan Manuel Gloria:
> > About the portability layer, I have planned the following set of API
> > between the portability layer and the rest of (readable-discuss impl):
> >
> > ; the portability implements its own port objects. On R5RS we
> > ; need to add 1 more lookahead character (current imple
BTW, I'm creating a new subject line - the module interface is important, and
we may want to go back to this discussion later.
My previous post outlined why I thought one module would be better (esp. for
porting), as well as a discussion about the interfaces and names.
I think there's an additi
