I asked:
> > Quick confirmation, to make sure we have the same understanding...
> > When you surrounded "srfi 41 primitive" with parens, did you intend
> > it to mean something different than if they weren't? Or was that just
> > a style you prefer?
Alan Manuel Gloria:
> Style preference; Scheme
On 2/18/13, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Alan Manuel Gloria:
>> <* define-library \\ (srfi 41 primitive)
>>
>> export . (
>> stream-cons stream-null
>> stream-pair? stream-null? stream?
>> stream-car stream-cdr
>> stream-lambda
>> )
>
> which can then be closed with:
>> *>
>
>
>
> Quick confi
Alan Manuel Gloria:
> <* define-library \\ (srfi 41 primitive)
>
> export . (
> stream-cons stream-null
> stream-pair? stream-null? stream?
> stream-car stream-cdr
> stream-lambda
> )
which can then be closed with:
> *>
Quick confirmation, to make sure we have the same understanding...
On Feb 13, 2013 6:26 AM, "David A. Wheeler" wrote:
>
> > Alan Manuel Gloria:
> > > xref. Arne Babenhauserheide's concept, I'm proposing that we steal his
> > > extended PERIOD notation and add it into sweet-expressions.
>
> > > <* define-library \\ (srfi 41 primitive)
> > >
> > > export
> > > .
> Alan Manuel Gloria:
> > xref. Arne Babenhauserheide's concept, I'm proposing that we steal his
> > extended PERIOD notation and add it into sweet-expressions.
> > <* define-library \\ (srfi 41 primitive)
> >
> > export
> > . stream-cons stream-null
> > . stream-pair? stream-null? stream?
>
Alan Manuel Gloria:
> xref. Arne Babenhauserheide's concept, I'm proposing that we steal his
> extended PERIOD notation and add it into sweet-expressions.
Thanks for writing this up, I've been noodling this as well.
It's certainly worth considering. As I just posted in a previous email, one of
xref. Arne Babenhauserheide's concept, I'm proposing that we steal his
extended PERIOD notation and add it into sweet-expressions.
Basically:
foo
. x
==>
(foo
x)
...which is currently what we have.
However, the extended PERIOD notation is:
foo
. x y
==>
(foo
x y)
... in contrast t
