Hi David,
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2014, 18:05:53 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> A few comments, though, besides ones already made. I have concerns that lone
> ":" is actually *widely* used for other purposes, e.g., type declarations,
> that this syntax interferes with. Similarly, "_" has many uses on
Hi Alan,
Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 06:51:44 schrieb Alan Manuel Gloria:
> The specifications do not indicate what the supported elements are.
> What happens if I input the C string "(define foo\n bar)\n"? (or in
> short, is parentheses supported?)
Within parentheses whitespace parsing is disabl
Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 06:34:16 schrieb Alan Manuel Gloria:
> Hmm? A name in the acknowledgements section maybe? As "Alan Manuel K.
> Gloria".
It’s in.
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Hi David,
Sorry for answering so late. I already adjusted the draft according to some of
your comments, but did not get out of the todo-torrent far enough to answer you
and finish the rest…
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2014, 18:05:53 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 19:50:45 +0200, Arne B
The specifications do not indicate what the supported elements are.
What happens if I input the C string "(define foo\n bar)\n"? (or in
short, is parentheses supported?) You reference SRFI-105, but only as
an indirect reference from SRFI-110. I'd assume you want each "token"
in your syntax to ac
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Am Sonntag, 1. Juni 2014, 08:35:58 schrieb Alan Manuel Gloria:
>> It might be better to extend your clarification section a little. I
>> think your intent here is that : at the beginning of a line adds an
>> extra open pa
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 19:50:45 +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide
wrote:
> > > Also despite the different focus we chose, I consider you folks to be the
> > > experts on indentation-sensitive lisp, so I would be very happy to get
> > > your opinion.
> > >
> > >
> > > http://draketo.de/proj/wisp/srf
Hi Alan,
Am Sonntag, 1. Juni 2014, 08:35:58 schrieb Alan Manuel Gloria:
> It might be better to extend your clarification section a little. I
> think your intent here is that : at the beginning of a line adds an
> extra open parentheses that gets closed at end-of-line (rule 4.2.7)
> *and* defines
In section 4.2.7:
A colon sourrounded by whitespace (" : ") starts a bracket which gets
closed at the end of the line.
However, in your earlier set of examples 4.1.3:
let
: x 1
y 2
z 3
body
It's not entirely clear how your example interacts with rule 4.2.7.
It might be better to ex
Hi,
I worked quite a bit on my simplified readable-spinoff wisp, and since it now
works pretty well, I drafted a SRFI. It is still quite rough, but the basics
should be in.
In the rationale I contrast it to readable, and it would be nice if you could
check whether I’m fair towards readable in
10 matches
Mail list logo
