On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:04:42 +0100, martijn brekelmans tijntj...@msn.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm fiddling around with clojure, and I'd like to use readable with clojure.
I've looked a little more at implementing readable (at least some tiers) in
Clojure, beyond
David A. Wheeler scripsit:
Not at all. The whole point is to have a syntax that is general, and
not tied to a particular semantic. Clearly it needs to be useful for
a given semantic, but not tied to it.
Well, indentation can model () or it can model []; it can't do both.
In CL or Scheme that
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:55:55 -0400, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Well, indentation can model () or it can model []; it can't do both.
In CL or Scheme that doesn't matter, because [] is inessential. In
Clojure it's essential.
I've been assuming that it'd model (). Interesting
Not at all. The whole point is to have a syntax that is general, and not tied
to a particular semantic. Clearly it needs to be useful for a given semantic,
but not tied to it.
On October 26, 2014 10:43:17 PM EDT, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
David A. Wheeler scripsit:
In Clojure,