Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2014, 18:34:25 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
It's possible to write code that is interpreted *identically*
on both wisp and sweet when indentation is enabled.
That’s cool!
In sweet, a . at the
beginning of a line post-indent is basically ignored.
Would it be possible
David A. Wheeler:
If wisp interpreted neoteric-expressions by default,
then many more expressions work in both systems...
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:38:13 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de
wrote:
That’s true, but then lines with a single element would be treated
differently than
Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 18:48:16 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
It is obviously possible to change the semantics of leading period.
I am hesitant to add yet another operator; you may disagree but I
really tried to make it a short list.
I know you did. Every single additional operator came
BTW,
It's possible to write code that is interpreted *identically*
on both wisp and sweet when indentation is enabled. In sweet, a . at the
beginning of a line post-indent is basically ignored. This was for consistency
with neoteric-expressions, and left there in part to be consistent with
