On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:50:53 -0400, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Another point is that not supporting `else` is non-conformant all the
way back to R2RS. Not supporting it makes Guile 1.6 a Not-Quite-Scheme.
Which just shows the need for standards and standards test suites.
To be
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:15:15 +0800, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since I'm pretty much the only one who wants Guile 1.6 support, and
I'm pretty satisfied with the perfectly working old version, feel free
to drop Guile 1.6 support. I just wanted to make clear the reason for
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:33 AM, David A. Wheeler
dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:28:39 +0800, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com
wrote:
(cond ... else) doesn't work in Guile 1.6 (it's why I coded them as
(cond .. #t) in the first place).
Drat. As noted in the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:28:39 +0800, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com
wrote:
(cond ... else) doesn't work in Guile 1.6 (it's why I coded them as
(cond .. #t) in the first place).
Drat. As noted in the ChangeLog, (cond... #t) causes warnings in chicken Scheme.
Hmm. We already do some text
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:41 AM, David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote:
Version 1.0.2 of the readable package is now available!!
It's a collection of small tweaks and improvements, primarily in the
documentation and Scheme implementation. Having many small improvements is a
*good*
Drat. What do you suggest?
On June 24, 2014 5:28:39 PM EDT, Alan Manuel Gloria almkg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:41 AM, David A. Wheeler
dwhee...@dwheeler.com wrote:
Version 1.0.2 of the readable package is now available!!
It's a collection of small tweaks and
