On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it is better to create an "executable" and then execute it.
Isn't this a lot harder to debug? It seems like dumping the contents
of a data structure is a lot easier than dumping subroutines. With
the high rate of P::RD initial grammar bugs
On Thursday, Jul 15, 2004 "Ted Zlatanov" said:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think it is better to create an "executable" and then execute it.
>
> Isn't this a lot harder to debug? It seems like dumping the contents
> of a data structure is a lot easier than dumping su
On Sunday, Jul 11, 2004 "Andrew A. Chen" said:
> Hello-
> I'm just starting out with PRD here, but I think I'm on the right track.
> I'm attempting to write a parser that evaluates a language similar to
> SQL's WHERE syntax. I'd also like to evaluate the result of this boolean
> expression wit
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The question here is that I'd like to be able to evaluate the above
> statements by passing in some values for num_oranges, num_apples,
> has_override, etc. Idealy, I'd like to be able to give it a hashref
> with all of these variables and then have
