Re: suppressing __VALUE__ in autotree

2004-05-15 Thread Aamer Akhter
On May 15, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ;-) The above is possible, but why post-process the created struct when you don't need to put in __VALUE__ at all? Because autotree is a generic feature, and you're asking for something very specific.

Re: suppressing __VALUE__ in autotree

2004-05-15 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Fri, 14 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ;-) The above is possible, but why post-process the created struct when you don't need to put in __VALUE__ at all? Because autotree is a generic feature, and you're asking for something very specific. At least that's my view of it. It's

Re: suppressing __VALUE__ in autotree

2004-05-14 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Thu, 13 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way of supressing the __VALUE__ hash that is added via a single terminal return in autotree? Right now I have to play silly little games on the return values. I realize that I could add my own return handler but autotree is _so_ nice

Re: suppressing __VALUE__ in autotree

2004-05-14 Thread Aamer Akhter
On May 14, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way of supressing the __VALUE__ hash that is added via a single terminal return in autotree? Right now I have to play silly little games on the return values. I realize that I could add my