Sean O'Rourke wrote:
Aamer Akhter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're starting a project that includes a parser that would convert a
huge swath of multi-device output (output of explicit commands) to an
XML tokenized form.
...
I've written parse::recdescent grammars for some of this output in
the
Hello,
This is really an open-ended question... and I pre-apologize for my rambling style.
So far all the examples of grammars I've seen are free standing on their own.
We're eval'ing prd for providing xmlization services for a lot of varied output.
It'll be mostly router output (from a
Hello,
Is there a way of supressing the __VALUE__ hash that is added via a single
terminal return in autotree? Right now I have to play silly little games on
the return values. I realize that I could add my own return handler but
autotree is _so_ nice otherwise.
aa
Just FYI, I've registered a perl bug for that issue
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29576
-Original Message-
From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
use strict;
use vars qw($parser $text %hol);
use Data::Dumper;
use Parse::RecDescent;
$Parse::RecDescent::skip = '[
Ron D. Smith schrieb:
...
Um the technical term for this is hell if I know. If you are irritated by
it now, imagine how irritating it gets when the file you are parsing is HUGE
and you get the whole thing for each an every attempt... (I modified the
PR::D source to truncate the output
Sorry for one more mail, but just for the record:
that has been my own fault. My both problems
(KEY1 = 'undef' and having to use ref $item{value})
were caused by these change in P:RD:
- BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE: The key of an %item entry for
a repeated subrule now includes the repetition
On Thu, 13 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way of supressing the __VALUE__ hash that is added via a
single terminal return in autotree? Right now I have to play silly
little games on the return values. I realize that I could add my own
return handler but autotree is _so_ nice
On May 14, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way of supressing the __VALUE__ hash that is added via a
single terminal return in autotree? Right now I have to play silly
little games on the return values. I realize that I could add my
