Similar things to your B) option have been done.A better pattern for
dynamic assembly that worked well in the past is a wrapper page(like full
page foundation template)+ include dynaments (dynamically include the
content in the right wrapper)+rewrites to screen URL complexity. We've
built sophi
Thanks for the Foundation tip, Joel.
Another responsive framework for web design is the Web Experience Toolkit,
which emphasizes accessibility for people with disabilities and usability.
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ws-nw/wa-aw/wet-boew/index-eng.asp
I haven't tested it yet.
On Thursday, Apri
Bootstrap is a great framework, and we are currently using it to produce a
few website from our install of 11.0 (soon to be 11.2).
Another framework that you may want to look into is called Foundation.
http://foundation.zurb.com/
I personally like foundation a little better than bootstrap, but
Ah! Cool, thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Apr 2014, at 15:06, Jian Huang wrote:
>
> Bootstrap is a responsive web design framework. It is relatively out of the
> box, just need to use their css and HTML structure
>
> Demo:
> http://getbootstrap.com/examples/theme/
>
> HTML instruction:
Bootstrap is a responsive web design framework. It is relatively out of
the box, just need to use their css and HTML structure
Demo:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/theme/
HTML instruction:
http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/
-Jian
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:03:12 AM UTC-4, Daniel P
Hi Jian
Thanks for elaborating!
Could you write a bit more around the bootstrap/foundation/skeleton you
mentioned? Sorry if this seems like a notice question, just wanted to
understand what you mean exactly. :)
Thanks!
Daniel
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Apr 2014, at 14:38, Jian Huang wrot
I figured I should elaborate.
Assuming you have a legacy site from 2008 or something, and you are not
doing a site redesign. Then dire a web company to give you JS and CSS,
when added to the site, and when site is viewed in mobile size (viewport),
the JS and CSS kicks in and resizes.
If you
My thought exactly.
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:05:39 AM UTC-4, RustyLogic wrote:
>
> Why not just make your site responsive?
>
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 7:58:39 PM UTC+1, Ryu wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What are your experiences in setting up a mobile version of a Reddot site?
>>
>> We curre
Why not just make your site responsive?
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 7:58:39 PM UTC+1, Ryu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What are your experiences in setting up a mobile version of a Reddot site?
>
> We currently have a very simple site, one variant, one language.
>
> We were considering two options:
>
>
ssage-
From: "Ryu"
Sent: 10/04/2014 4:58
To: "reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com"
Subject: Best practices to setup a mobile site in reddot
Hi all,
What are your experiences in setting up a mobile version of a Reddot site?
We currently have a very simple site, one variant
Hi all,
What are your experiences in setting up a mobile version of a Reddot site?
We currently have a very simple site, one variant, one language.
We were considering two options:
1) Create a separate variant for mobile. The only issue we have with this
is that the pages will have to be publi
11 matches
Mail list logo
