On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:01, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> so my biggest problem is that, when I've got these error and keep
> getting the error, than do wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack and it's just
> 300-400 so I assume 48632 is more than enough. am I wrong?
Hmm no not wrong, i am sure that wc -l
hi,
so my biggest problem is that, when I've got these error and keep
getting the error, than do wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack and it's just
300-400 so I assume 48632 is more than enough. am I wrong?
Balint Cristian wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:23, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
I forgot to menti
Tarhon-Onu Victor wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote:
you can change it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
Be careful if increase will eat more memory
Or if you don't have {S,D}NAT rules in the nat table it would be
wise to r
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:23, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> I forgot to mention that it can't be the reason:
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
> 48632
>
> Balint Cristian wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
> > 8184
> >
> > It is 8000 entry by defa
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote:
> you can change it:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
>
> Be careful if increase will eat more memory
Or if you don't have {S,D}NAT rules in the nat table it would be
wise to rmmod ip_conntrack
hi,
I forgot to mention that it can't be the reason:
# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
48632
Balint Cristian wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
8184
It is 8000 entry by default
you can change it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
8184
It is 8000 entry by default
you can change it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
Be careful if increase will eat more memory
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 14:29, Farkas Levente wrot
