Hi!
I have made a new install of RH8 and make udpate for up2date succesfully
but when I try to register after the first window I get an error "method
not allowed while retrieving privacy statements".
What is wrong?
Sasa
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://w
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 16:13:59 -0500
MKlinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 30 August 2003 16:02, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > Why doesn't it work if you give rpm the name with [1] in it that's
> > the question. The name shouldn't make any difference if you get it
> > right in the rpm.
> >
On Saturday 30 August 2003 16:02, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Why doesn't it work if you give rpm the name with [1] in it that's
> the question. The name shouldn't make any difference if you get it
> right in the rpm.
>
It's possible that the RPM utility parses the command argument line for
version
Hello,I have a wireless usb device(atmel at76c503a) and i'm trying to connect the wireless LAN of my house with that device, however redhat recognizes this device as a system device, and not as a network one. I ahve tried many times to setup the wireless connection through the internet connection
Why doesn't it work if you give rpm the name with [1] in it that's the
question. The name shouldn't make any difference if you get it right in
the rpm.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stewart M. Ives
> Sent: Saturday, Au
Another solution:
I had the same problem and it didn't hit me until I read what you did with
wget when you got the real file name downloaded and not the file name with
the extra [1] in it. I also downloaded w IE6 and got the extra [1] in the
file name and the same error msg you got when I ran the
Problem solved..
when I downloaded the file from https://rhn.redhat.com/help/latest-up2date.pxt (with
Iexplorer) clicking on the file I got it with a wrong
name (up2date-3[1].1.23.2-1.i386.rpm)..
I download it again with wget and it´s work ok.. I
think that it´s a problem internet explor
It’s telling you that it can’t
find the rpm’s. You need cd to the directory that you downloaded the rpm’s
to.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Esteban Pizzini
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003
12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
Esteban Pizzini wrote:
I have downloaded rpm´s that should be installed in RH 9 , and I
follow the instructions on the web.
I have checked md5sum and they are Ok.
I have tried with rpm -Uvh filenames and rpm -Fvh filenames.. and It
doesn´t work... :( I get the same error..
Byes
- Origin
Maybe a RBL timeout. Try:
rbl_timeout 3
pyzor_timeout 3
razor_timeout 5
-Original Message-
From: Robert C. Paulsen Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: spamassassin -- a couple of questions.
Why does Spamassassin ta
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:37:05PM -0500, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote:
> Why does Spamassassin takes 30.6 seconds to process an email? Here is a
> section of my maillog:
>
> Aug 30 12:30:12 avalon fetchmail[597]: awakened at Sat 30 Aug 2003 12:30:12 PM CDT
> Aug 30 12:30:17 avalon fetchmail[597]:
Why does Spamassassin takes 30.6 seconds to process an email? Here is a
section of my maillog:
Aug 30 12:30:12 avalon fetchmail[597]: awakened at Sat 30 Aug 2003 12:30:12 PM CDT
Aug 30 12:30:17 avalon fetchmail[597]: 1 message for robert at paulsenonline.net (830
octets).
Aug 30 12:30:17 avalon
I have downloaded rpm´s that should be installed in
RH 9 , and I follow the instructions on the web.
I have checked md5sum and they are Ok.
I have tried with rpm -Uvh filenames and rpm -Fvh
filenames.. and It doesn´t work... :( I get the same error..
Byes
- Original Message
Hello,
I just got ALSA installed on my redhat 9 dell inspiron 8000 with a
maestro3 sound card. The drivers load, but when gnome starts it reports
that it can't find /dev/sound/mixer. I tried a symlink to /dev/mixer,
but that didn't work. Any thoughts?
Thanks
Marc Boorshtein
--
Marc Boorsht
Did you download the rpm’s?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Esteban Pizzini
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003
9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: updating up2date in RH9
Hi, I trying to update up2date because of the Red
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:20, L. K. Pierce wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:14, L. K. Pierce wrote:
> > Is it possible to search them online or must I download them
> > all and search locally? That just seems an odd way to do it.
>
> Sorry, folks.
>
> I should have looked a little closer at the
Follow the instructions. Obviously the file is not in the same
directory or you entered the filename incorrectly. The instructions to
install the up2date work. I did them myself and I know they work.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 11:07, Johnie Stafford wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:26:54 -0300, "Esteban Pizzini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Try rpm -Uvh up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm
>
Even simpler: rpm -Uvh up2*
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto
>>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:26:54 -0300, "Esteban Pizzini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ep> Hi, I trying to update up2date because of the Red Hat Network Certificate
Expiration and I download this files:
ep> up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm
ep> up2date-gnome-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm
ep> (the ones that ap
Hi, I trying to update up2date because of the Red
Hat Network Certificate Expiration and I download this
files:up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm
(the ones that appear in the web site when you
select RH 9)
When I make rpm -Fvh up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm
up2dat
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:39, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
>
> RDB
You should easily be able to duplicate the entry by telnetting into your
web server on port 80 and issue the same or similar GET request. In my
case the URL req
nobody is just that "nobody" it is a user who
doesn't exist and they are the lowest man on the
chain of command. Most damons will run as nobody
for the porpose of *not* giving the application
any access to any resources (none whatsoever).
Simply do their own thing and not interfer with
anyon
How did you try to edit this file (I mean, what command you have used)?
What is the output of the command 'ls -la /etc/hosts'?
Alexey Fadyushin
Brainbench MVP for Linux
http://www.brainbench.com
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Somethin weird happened on my box and the /etc/h
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Devil's Advocate
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dual-boot RH9/Windows XP using GRUB
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have Redhat 9 and Windows XP insta
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:14, L. K. Pierce wrote:
> Is it possible to search them online or must I download them
> all and search locally? That just seems an odd way to do it.
Sorry, folks.
I should have looked a little closer at the archives page. I found the
search option.
Larry (with a sheep
Okay, this is definitely a newbie question.
I want to search the list's archives before posting a couple questions
concerning minor annoyances/problems that I have with the gnome desktop
on RH 8.0. I've gone to www.redhat.com and found the archives for the
list and can download them, but I can'
This results in:
could not open the package file: pear
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Martin Marques
Sent: zaterdag 30 augustus 2003 14:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pear problem (PHP package)
El Sáb 30 Ago 2003 09:02, R
El Sáb 30 Ago 2003 09:02, Redhat escribió:
> When I do:
>
> pear upgrade
>
> This is what happens...
>
> could not open the package file:
>
> So it doesnt work...
Sorry.
# pear upgrade pear
--
09:23:01 up 8 days, 1:13, 4 users, load average: 0.03, 0.14, 0.25
---
Hey everyone,
Somethin weird happened on my box and the /etc/hosts file turned out to be
empty. I tried editing it but I keep getting : Input/Output error from
bash. any clues?
Dont think the file is there, so why cant i write to it?
TIA,
-vivek
-
Hi all,
I have Redhat 9 and Windows XP installed on the same system, and at the moment
I am using a boot floppy to boot into Redhat.
I tried to install GRUB on the MBR by running /sbin/grub-install /dev/hda but
when I rebooted the system, I am dumped at the grub> prompt.
I tried using GRUBConf
When I do:
pear upgrade
This is what happens...
could not open the package file:
So it doesnt work...
Regards,
Ivo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Martin Marques
Sent: zaterdag 30 augustus 2003 13:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
To start, I am not a MySQL user, though I had to test a couple of those
servers once, so I don't have much experience on it.
But lets see.
El Vie 29 Ago 2003 12:46, Parker Morse escribió:
>
> > Did you try to execute some small php script (just make a connection
> > without a
> > query) from the
El Vie 29 Ago 2003 18:10, IS escribió:
> I have some problems with a PHP script. This script fails to check
> something that works in exactly the same situation on another machine. I
> would try to update my default installed pear package that comes with
> RedHat 9.
>
> When I do:
>
> pear up
Hai
I remove some of my files using the 'rm' command.
If anyone knows how to get back the files please
send the details.
If I don't know the file name how can i retrieve it.
Thanks in advance.
sabai.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design softwa
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 18:31, Denham Eva wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the input thus far.
>
> Ok, this is obviously not a gnome problem, I suspect this is a permissions
> problem. Why? well when I vnc into the root account using your example below
> as base command, it works perfectly.
>
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for the input thus far.
Ok, this is obviously not a gnome problem, I suspect this is a permissions
problem. Why? well when I vnc into the root account using your example below
as base command, it works perfectly.
Any ideas on what permissions I may not have a standard user?
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:16, Denham Eva wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Thanks for your input, appreciated. I've tried starting the vncserver
> manually I also used the -name gnome and I tried the kde option. However the
> gnome-settings-daemon still crashes.
> This is the error message:
> Application
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 11:48, Rik Thomas wrote:
> Anyone else seeing double posts?
Only when I'm not wearing my glasses, mate.
--
Sat Aug 30 17:20:00 EST 2003
17:20:00 up 5 days, 7:06, 3 users, load average: 0.87, 0.81, 0.57
-
|
Thanks Jason,
I'll look into the X client for windows.
Denham
>Getting a x client for windows would also be a solution. Then you could
use X to switch from copmuter to computer. I think there is a gpl X client
for windows out there.
Jason Tesser
Web/Multimedia Programmer
Northland Baptist Bi
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for your input, appreciated. I've tried starting the vncserver
manually I also used the -name gnome and I tried the kde option. However the
gnome-settings-daemon still crashes.
This is the error message:
Application "gnome-settings-daemon"(process 1438) has crashed due to fat
First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML
\ / email and proprietary forma
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:40 am, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote:
> H were these always commented out at install time or at some later
> time? If at a later time was apache restarted since the config changed?
The config has never been changed since install. Apache was recently restarted
(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:35:08 EDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:24 am, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Reuben D.
Budiardja" said:
> >I saw this in my http access_log. What does this mean?
> >
> >61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET
> > http://www.sina.com.cn/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
> >
> >I s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:04:44 EDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/
HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
Do you have an open proxy? Close it.
--
H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
I saw this in my http access_log. What does this mean?
61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/
HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
I saw no corresponding error log.
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronom
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 19:23, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> > Not all memory work in all machines. The 128 you added maybe
> > wrong for your machine. Parity, no parity, oem,...etc. Check
> > with the manufacturer to see what kind of memory you need
>
> True. They were closed when I got home this e
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 09:48, Rik Thomas wrote:
> Anyone else seeing double posts?
no
no
--
http://www.shorewall.net Shorewall, for all your firewall needs
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Anyone else seeing double posts?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 11:21, lisa ryan wrote:
Hi,
can anyone tell me a quick way of finding out what may be causing the / file
system to fill up ?
I did a find on any large files, but it's still at 100% and I can't seem to
bring it down.
Thanks
Lisa
Here's what I came up with when I was in a simil
I'm trying to compile a RH9 custom kernel for this all-SCSI system.
For configuration, I started with:
/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-6/configs/kernel-2.4.20-i586.config
Now,
# make modules install
fails with:
sh -x ./ins 2.4.20-6custom bzImage /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-6/System.map ""
+ '[' -x /ro
* Zoran's mailinglist account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-29 14:00]:
> Le 28/08/2003 21:06, ??Marc Adler?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit?:
>
> > * Kent Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-28 09:00]:
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Zoran's mailinglist
> >> account wrote:
[snip]
> *** Y
53 matches
Mail list logo
