-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:37:51 -0400 (EDT), Keith Olmstead wrote:
> I am trying to get Gnome to start. I moved my Home directory to
/usr/home and now tries to start but does not. Can some one help me.
I changed my home directory in the password file,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 06:20:55 -0500, Marcel wrote:
> When I check the memory status within "KDE Control Center" or just by the
> command "free" or "top", I can see how the physical memory is beeing filled
> every time something is written onto the ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Oct 2003 18:57:09 +0100, Jeff wrote:
> I'm trying to compile some new software that needs loads of dev. tools -
> gcc, perl modules etc. Silly me didnt install the dev kit when i
> installed RH9 :o
>
> Now the problem..I tried using the 'add/re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT), Dave Martini 1 wrote:
> Hi and thanks to everyone that replied to my message there were
> many of you. I learned from your replies that the RH 9 version
> of tora that I had originally downloaded would probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:41:07 -0700, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> I tried make oldconfig and it looked in and took it's info from
> /usr/src/linux-2.4/config/kernel-2.4.20-i686.config, which is what I get
> with uname -r. Then it created a new ".conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:41:57 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> If .config exists, "make oldconfig" will use that.
>
> > If you are copying a config file to start from, why would you do a "make
> > oldconfig"?
>
> You wouldn't need to. Under stock ker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT), Dave Martini 1 wrote:
> I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
> What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
[I don't cover package tools like Yum or APT-RP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 07:51:43 -0700, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> > The easiest way is to do a make "oldconfig". That will load all of your old
> > configuration and then do a "make xconfig" or which ever one you use.
>
> Forgive me for not yet being a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:41:31 +0530 (IST), Himanshu Arora wrote:
> I'm getting some errors in my Qt program which is very hard for me to
> understand as i am new to Qt.
> The code is :
>
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> class A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:53:08 -0400, Robert Keeney wrote:
> I have a really odd problem with a Dell GX300 and RH73.
>
> Modprobe runs at what seems to be random times and goes into some sort of loop. It
> can't be killed and uses up almost all of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Oct 2003 23:03:22 -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 22:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:52:20 +0800, Brian wrote:
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:36:12 -0700, Mike Klein wrote:
> There's a first time for everything...
>
> I was doing a remote rpm install of libfwbuilder using VNC, which
> normally works fine, and this time my login session hung after
> displaying 100%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:52:20 +0800, Brian wrote:
> I have problem to install kernel-2.4.20-20.7.i386.rpm
> in redhat 7.2
>
> When i install the kernel, it needs the iptables
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# rpm -ivh kernel*
> error: failed dependencies:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:34:04 -0400 (EDT), Rik Thomas wrote:
> No where did I say digital signatures weren't important. They are a
> vital tool in personal communication, not on a group mailing lists. I
> said they were not appreciated on mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:10:57 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> I wish everyone signed their messages, but inline and without attachments.
> I wish I had already taken the time to figure out how to sign mine, but
> inline and without attachments. Digit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:22:30 -0400, Rik Thomas wrote:
> > Seriously, every time I post a message to this list I get two emails
> > back that my mail was rejected by Sturman Industries because of an
> > executable file attachment which in turn our serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:57:41 -0700, David Demner wrote:
> Does apt use the same backport technique?
How could it? It's just a package tool.
> Or are you always getting the
> latest/greatest/potentially incompatible version of the software by using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:42:37 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 2. We have a Redhat advance server.
> > The administrator had not up to today activated the rhn_register/up2date
> > setup.
> > When he tried, he got the e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:03:27 +0200 (SAST), Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have two rpm questions.
> 1. On redhat 9 by forcing installs etc. i got rpm to a state where it
> hung.
> With some difficulty i killed it. It now does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:27:45 +0530, Nabin Limbu wrote:
> I have upgraded my kernel to 2.4.20-20.9 via up2date with no problem
> in RH9. In this new kernel, I wanted to enable a cyclades card in
> kernel for which I complied this kernel as below:
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:
> I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the most recent version of
> OpenSSL available on their website was version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains
> important bugfixes) b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08 Oct 2003 23:06:59 +0200, Michiel v.d. linden wrote:
> I'm trying to install Mysql from the RH80 cd's. Right now it looks like
> I'm in a endless loop..see install efforts below
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -iv mysql-3.23.52-3.i386.rpm
> war
a wrongly
placed reply to maintain context. The reply does not refer to anything
after the first three lines:
"T. Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:37:43AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:55:19 -0400, William J. Salvino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:39:04 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have seen a reference on another mailing list that Red Hat has taken steps
> to ensure that outfits like Cheapbytes have a simple, legally unambiguous way
> to make copies available. S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 22:18:42 -0400, Eric Wood wrote:
> The procmail maillist list isn't working for me... may be down. So I'll try
> here..
>
>
> Basically I want search for key terms only after stripping the HTML from the
> message because many spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:34:29 -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> Okay, I have been beating my head regarding tripwire. First off, let me
> thank Bret Hughes for his twpolclean.pl. That decreased my error count
> due to files not on the system.
> My question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:55:19 -0400, William J. Salvino wrote:
> After all the posts about the new Red Hat release and Fedora and looking
> at the product pricing on Redhat.com I still have one question:
>
> Will there be a new-release boxed Red Hat o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:33:14 -0400 (EDT), Gerry Doris wrote:
> http://www.redhat.com/software/workstation/
> I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong but the workstation version is NOT
> equal to the old Redhat Linux. It sounds like the WS version is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:24:12 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> I see these everyday in the logwatch mail to root, on a Redhat 9 box. Anyone
> else sees this? Is this something I need to worry about? kernel bug?
Nah, logwatch bug. /etc/log.d/script
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:16:07 -0500, Rich Ransom wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my php to php-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm
> but when I run : rpm -Uvh php-4.3.2-7.i386.rpm
> I get:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> php = 4.2.2-17 is needed by (installed) ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:30:01 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 06:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'll assume you are using runtime 3
> >
> > rename /etc/rc3.d/K15httpd to S15httpd
> > rename /etc/rc3.d/K12mysqld to S1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:26:00 -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:02:13PM +0300, Karasik, Vitaly wrote:
> > Below is my question to RH and theirs answer:
>
> Their answer is misleading -
The question was confusing, too. The average c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:59:26 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> > >
> > > Err - "redhat-list" is still on that page, too, and so are all others.
> >
> > Uhm, you didn't read my message, did you? Try again,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:33:30 -0400, TK wrote:
> The lesson is, before you make any change to a partition, make sure no
> partition from the same physical device is mounted. And use fdisk, not
> cfdisk (despite it's much more user-friendly).
Must b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:34:35 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > [Recycling the reply I posted to redhat-list and fedora-list just a
> > few minutes ago. Why the separate cross-post?]
>
> Because not everyone subscribes to all three lists and I want to g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:17:36 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> If I read this exchange correctly, Fedora may not be a RH 10 equivalent for
> those users of previous versions of RHL. Not a good sign?
Can you explain this question a bit? No part of what you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:11:41 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Now I see that I misread your post. The first three messages posted to this
> thread were concerned about redhat-list. Your comment about rhl-list, being
> correct, but somewhat out of context,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:04:00 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> It is simple. All subscribers of the rhl-* lists have NOT been transfered to
> the fedora-* lists. I subscribe to both rhl-list and fedora-list and they are
> quite different.
No. rhl-list is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:03:00 -0400, Vince Scimeca wrote:
> I subscribed to the fedora-list and I am getting different messages then
> on this list so they seem to be different.
Of course they are different.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:17:16 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> >
> > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:15:05 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> >
> > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
> > to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rhl-* lists have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rhl-* lists have been renamed
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:02:23 -0700, Mike McMullen wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea when the demo accounts are no longer functional?
Where did you read that it would happen?
- --
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:29:42 +0100, oxfordmusic.net wrote:
> sorry if this is a very basic question but i'm new to RedHat (ex-Cobalt).
>
> i have 2 Redhat Boxes (7.2) which both show
> # rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-2.4.18-18.7.x
>
> logging into RHN i s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:50:00 +0200, Harald Baumann wrote:
> I had a strange crash of a RAID 5 System - all data lost.
>
> Compaq Proliant 3000 2x450 MHz
> Smart Array Controller 5302 connected with DELL 220s PowerVault ( 3x72 GB
> RAID 5 )
> RedHat 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:43:36 +0530, Harish wrote:
> Sep 23 23:54:49 server insmod:
> /lib/modules/2.4.22-20.1.2024.2.36.nptl/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipchains.o:
> init_module: Device or resource busy
iptables and ipchains conflict with eachother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:26:55 +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> OK, the real log files tell me the job was run at 4:08.31 and 'su news'
> was executed then, and logged out one second later.
>
> There IS a job in cron.daily called inn-cron-expire.
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:05:28 +0530, Harish wrote:
> I saved the iptables and in my next reboot i did see the NAT rules in
> /etc/iptables but still my NAT would not function, I figuerd out that it
> is not able to build a chain bcos ipt_MASQUERADE.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:20:42 +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> I've googled on this and it HAS been asked before on a few lists, but
> I've found no answer.
>
> Logwatch tells me:
>
> su:
> Sessions Opened:
>(uid=0) -> news: 1 Time(s)
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:08:40 -0600, bfd wrote:
> Where can I find BitTorrent .rpms for RH 7.3 and RH 9 --- I've tried
> Goggle and am not happy with what it turned up.
RHL 9 => http://www.fedora.us or your favourite mirror
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:06:11 -0500, Vinay Keerthy wrote:
> I am not sure if this is the right place to post this, please let me
> know if I should be posting this somewhere else and excuse me if this
> has already been posted.
[snip]
https://bugzil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:24:45 -0700, Rhugga wrote:
> What is the latest and greatest USENET news server software out there?
> (free and open source orf course)
Questions like that don't make much sense. You could search a
directory like http://freshm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Sep 2003 20:24:00 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> Everyone knows the Internet is a dangerous place. Folks who've been on
> this list for a whileave probably heard me harp about security by now.
> If you have, then you know I'm a nut when it comes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:27:32 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This will probably start a firestorm of additional posting, for
> which I am sorry, but, I seem to remember that at this time
> last year I was downloading RH9 CD's.
Impossible, because R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:26:46 -0500, Bob Hartung wrote:
> I have a new (clean not upgrade) install of RH9 and when
> trying to do an "rpm --rebuilddb" I receive the following error:
>
> error: db4 error(16) from dbenv->remove: Device or
> resou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:25:15 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> I am trying to run some ipchains command for NAT-ing with RH 9, which acts as
> a master node for a beowulf cluster.
>
> When running ipchainsI got the message "Protocol not available"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:08:42 -0400 (EDT), Chris Purcell wrote:
> No? Are you saying that the instructions I gave don't work?
No. But you replied to this message
https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-September/msg02137.html
which ment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:57:13 -0400 (EDT), Chris Purcell wrote:
> You can add your credentials to the 4th field of the /etc/fstab file like
> this...
>
> //server/share /mnt/smb smbfs username=admin,password=secret 0 0
>
> Sorry for using the wr
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:52:31 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Well, you could try this:
>
> # rpm -ihv php-4.2.2-17.i386.rpm --force --nodeps
If this is just a guess, then don't try this.
Whenever someone suggests --nodeps, he should give an explanation as
why it would be safe to ignore the packa
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Khademul Islam wrote:
> Now I have the folling in my crontab.
>
> 59 23 * * * sh /etc/cron.specialTest/ >> With this I
> got the error message (I thought it should run any
> executable located under the SpeicalTest folder >>
>
> /etc/cron.specialTest: /e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:42:05 -0400, Marvin Blackburn wrote:
> Does this version support ftps (i.e. is it compiled with the openssl
> libraries)?
Which version exactly?
$ rpm -q lftp
lftp-2.6.3-3
$ rpm -qR lftp | grep ssl
libssl.so.4
$ rpm -q --c
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:41:16 -0500, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote:
> My rhn notification icon is showing a red exclamation point. When I
> click on it it tells me thaty there is a new kernel, but it shows the
> same version number for both the currently installed and the new kernel.
>
> When I laun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:10:22 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 10 7 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.special
> > 02 6 16 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.specialMonthly
> > 02 22 * * 6 root run-parts /etc/cron.specialWeekly
>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:01:09 -0700 (PDT), Sambit Nanda wrote:
> On My RH9 on Intel-32
> My logwatch send me some mail like this
>
> WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
> (reserved error code) -- (asc=0x...: 10Time(s)
> (vendor-specific error)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT), Khademul Islam wrote:
> I have setup crontab, using crontab -e to send some
> e-mail in a routine basis. This is the error message I
> got ... how I can fix it?
I think I've answered a similar question recent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:23:41 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> This happens when I run certain programs like 'wget', 'rpm'
> 'Segmentation fault'
If this happens on an unmodified installation of Red Hat Linux, it
could be an indication of bad RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:57:25 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> > > This is what I got.
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -Kv red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i386.rpm
> > > red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i386.rpm:
> > > Header V3 DSA sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:27:30 -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote:
> warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 8df56d05
> Error: Could not find the GPG Key necessary to validate pkg
> /var/cache/yum/fedora-stable/packages/tpctl-4.6-0.fdr.2.rh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:03:56 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> > Specifying a custom MDA such as in your case is dangerous. For
> > instance, if your disk is full, procmail has no way to bounce a
> > message. You would lose mail. Additionally, you override th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:51:22 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> > No, read up in "man fetchmail" on how to specify the target user
> > in the config file, e.g. with "is marc". But fetchmail is mighty
> > with regard to config options, so there are several ways
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:25:03 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> This is what I got.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -Kv red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i386.rpm
> red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i386.rpm:
> Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:36:15 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> The contents of /etc/fetchmailrc are a copy of my .fetchmailrc, because
> I saw that the script was calling /etc/fetchmailrc, and I wanted it to
> send my mail to my mbox, not root's. All the "los
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:39:50 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> When I try to install Red Carpet RPM, I get the following error;
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -ivh red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i386.rpm
> error: red-carpet-2.0.2-0.ximian.6.1.i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:22:58 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> I'm not sure where to post this, so I'll start here.
>
> The problem: my computer is only downloading email from my pop3 account
> when it's actually on. All messages that come in while it's off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:24:50 -0400, Parker Morse wrote:
> I'm using RH 9.0 with sshd version OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 on our web server.
> I'm only allowing FTP connections via sftp.
>
> Whenever a user for a specific site connects to sftp, then disconnects,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:55:00 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was trying to update my glibc but I wasn't having successes then
> I made a big mistake removing the installed glibc, after that the system
> stopped.
> So, to try to recover it, I reb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:45:18 +0800, Callan K L Tham wrote:
> > Is there any tool can chat with msn users on Linux?
>
> Everybody missed Centericq:
>
> http://konst.org.ua/centericq/
>
> Especially for people who run screen and like stuff in an xterm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:33:28 +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Or simply disconnect your internal speaker :)
Not so simple with mainboards which have an onboard speaker.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/WmpM0i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:16:32 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> > Remember that "su -" will alter your environment to include /sbin and
> > /usr/sbin, while "su" will not.
>
> I did not know that. In all the years I've been doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:57:46 -0400, Broadcast IT wrote:
> K, here ya go...hope you're on to something...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ls -la up2date*
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 360959 Sep 5 10:10
> up2date-2[1].8.40-2.7.2.i386.rpm
> -rw-r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:26:03 -0400, Broadcast IT wrote:
> Logged in as root, and I'm not getting any messages at all. I've looked in
> the rpm, up2date and messages logs and don't see anything about my attempts.
Please run this in the directory where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:33:48 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > I am in serious problem. One of my Linux server crashed today and on
> > booting it is giving error "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY" PLEASE RUN FSCK
> > MANUALLY. Than it ask for root passwor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:37:36 +0200, Bjørn-Sverrre Nøttum wrote:
> I have just installed RadHat 9 server and I am trying to register the system
> with rhn network. When I write rhn_register in text- mode I get the
> following error message:
>
> "The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Sep 2003 09:40:48 +0800, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
> > I installed a program using rpm. It's not running properly, so now want
> > to remove it. When I execute rpm -e filename, I get the error message
> > 'filename not installed'. How do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:49:04 -0500, Khademul Islam wrote:
> Does anyone knows how I can change the e-mail address in the redhat mailing
> list.
Spend some time on the page which is listed at the bottom of almost
every message. Check out all the option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 17:21:22 +0100, A. S. Budden wrote:
> Thus spake Earl Eiland:
> > I installed a program using rpm. It's not running properly, so now want
> > to remove it. When I execute rpm -e filename, I get the error message
> > 'filename not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:18:12 -0500, Khademul Islam wrote:
> I have setup crontab, using crontab -e to send some e-mail in a routine
> basis. This is the error message I got today how I can fix it?
>
> >>>
> & 9
> Message 9:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:49 -0400, Charles Bronson wrote:
> > Why not upgrade both packages at once?
>
> Go for it. I was just being explicit.
No, your example doesn't work without --nodeps and is not
equivalent to:
rpm -Uvh up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:47:16 -0400, Charles Bronson wrote:
> Doug Finch wrote:
> > I am trying to reset my up2date and keep getting an error with the RPM:
> > up2date = 3.1.23.1 is needed by (installed) up2date-gnome-3.1.23.1-5
> > and when I try to r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:46:25 -0400, Juan Martinez wrote:
> > I can see that now! It has been running every minute, and filling my
> > mailbox with notices! How do I get rid of the notification function?
> >
> > MAILTO= didn't work.
>
> Redirect the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:43:47 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8328
>
> What is the correct id?
Cut'n paste error. Shouldn't be too hard to add a digit
between 1 and 9. ;) Probably faster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Aug 2003 08:34:17 -0400, James Pifer wrote:
> I'm running Redhat 9 on several systems. I just installed a new system
> for testing some stuff and started having this problem:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm --rebuilddb
> error: db4 error(16) from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:38:55 +0800, richard yuwono wrote:
> thanks for the reply Marcos.
Huh? Consider replying below quotes. That would make sense.
> this is what i tried at the grub prompt:
>
> > root (hd0,5)
> -- filesystem type is ext2fs, part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:28:18 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > Well, you could try unsparsing a file.. it's a blind shot, it makes no
> >sense, but it's worth a try (on the smallest huge file).
> >
> >cp --sparse=always big.wav test.wav
>
> That's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:54:04 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> I could not open the file with khexedit, since it complained about
> insufficient memory (I have only 256MB of RAM in this machine). But the
> theory of it actually having spaces or zeroes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:06:10 -0300, Geoffrey Lane wrote:
> I've been doing a net search on google for gui, iptables based firewall
> program to edit, view, add to the firewall rules that were set during my
> redhat 9 installation. Being a newbie to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:56:52 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > The problem with your WAV files is not that they contain sparse
> > blocks. If they did, they would not sound good, because you would hear
> > every blank block. And since they are listed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:07:47 -0300, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
> > Well, the page has a Unix FAQ, some Linux sections, a Java clock
> > applet, and many other things. Can you be sure, your browser did not
> > follow a link to that page?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 06:42:17 -0300, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
>I'm trying to understand this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] heinloft]$ netstat -an | head -n 20
> Active Internet connections (servers and established)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Loca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 00:03:43 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Will "sparsing" or "unsparsing" the file (whichever is the one that fixes
> the problem) eliminate those blank spaces? I have 40M files that (after
> being copied to a second hard drive) s
1 - 100 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
