Re: Symlinks and absolute vs relative paths

2003-06-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 10:38 06 Jun 2003, Jeffrey Pleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I am a relative newbie to Linux/Unix adn am having an issue with symlinks. | I have a system where there are files and directories in user's home | directories that are symlinked to a mounted filesystem (read only). the | problem is

Re: SymLinks..

2003-02-06 Thread Ted Gervais
meone else always says... > > My $.02 > > Rick > > -Original Message- > From: Ted Gervais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SymLinks.. > > On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:12 pm, Bret

RE: SymLinks..

2003-02-06 Thread Rick Carroll
ay, February 06, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SymLinks.. On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:12 pm, Bret Hughes wrote: Hi Rick and Brett and others on the list. Thanks for your assistance. I tried some of your examples here and while it works I can't quite get my head around

Re: SymLinks..

2003-02-06 Thread Ted Gervais
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:12 pm, Bret Hughes wrote: Hi Rick and Brett and others on the list. Thanks for your assistance. I tried some of your examples here and while it works I can't quite get my head around how I would find the following link. Here is what is happening. I installed a

RE: SymLinks..

2003-02-06 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 09:51, Rick Carroll wrote: > The man page for find says to use -type l > (that's the letter L in lower case.) > as in > find / -type l -print > There is also the symlinks command that will identify problem symlinks and show whether they are relative or absolute. try man s

RE: SymLinks..

2003-02-06 Thread Rick Carroll
The man page for find says to use -type l (that's the letter L in lower case.) as in find / -type l -print Rick -Original Message- From: Ted Gervais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SymLinks.. I wonder

Re: symlinks and ftp

2002-07-25 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 12:47:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oops. Forgot to mention that I am now running redhat 7.3, with WuFTPd no > modifications. If you haven't done any mods, then you're chrooted by default. Update /etc/ftpaccess to fit your needs. .../Ed > -- > > I'm t

RE: symlinks and ftp

2002-07-25 Thread Engstrom_Carl
Oops. Forgot to mention that I am now running redhat 7.3, with WuFTPd no modifications. -- I'm trying to get symbolic links to work over ftp and I can't figure it out. It used to work in older versions of RH, but no longer. Basically, I just want to be able to link some directories for several

Re: symlinks and ftp

2002-07-25 Thread Jeff Bearer
I've noticed that some FTP clients don't use symlinks. primarly I've seen it using cuteFTP pro via SFTP. I don't recall with regular FTP. It may be a SFTP thing? I'm not sure. On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm trying to get symbolic links to work over ftp and I can'

Re: symlinks and rename

2000-10-10 Thread Bret Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi, > > i'm having some problems when using the rename library function, when > > i try to rename a file thru a link, ie. the destination directory in > > pointed to by a link. The rename function seems to work ok for > > links within the same partition / device - but f