On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, David E. Fox wrote:
One thing in particular I noticed early on - especially on DOS, is that
the rand() function isn't good enough for certain applications, for
Well, what do you expect, working libraries on DOS? :) The random number
generator under Linux is reasonably
On Wed, Jul 01, 1998 at 12:40:21PM -0400, Joseph C. Tuttle wrote:
Is there a simple way in Linux to generate a series of three hundred to
four hundred unique random four digit numbers? I haven't done enough
programming to write my own random number generator, but I do know Linux
can generate
Hi, I just jumped in on this thread because I'm curious about something.
William Wilson wrote:
random() is better than rand(), but only because
you can set more options on the function call.
rand() is probably there for compatibility.
"man 3 rand" on my RH5.0 system produces:
Is there a simple way in Linux to generate a series of three hundred to
four hundred unique random four digit numbers? I haven't done enough
programming to write my own random number generator, but I do know Linux
can generate them for its own uses. I have searched man and info pages,
and the
"jct" == Joseph C Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jct Is there a simple way in Linux to generate a series of three
jct hundred to four hundred unique random four digit numbers? I
jct haven't done enough programming to write my own random number
jct generator, but I do know Linux can
