[Patch] Addition of Clustering (ie non backref'd grouping)

2001-02-08 Thread Michael McCallum
Hi all, I have started using the regexp package because is nice and lightweight but found I could not use clustering. I think it might be a Perl extension to re but found it was easy to implement in this package. This allows the use of the following style matching. (?:\w+(?:\s\w+)+ Mary had a

Re: [Patch] Addition of Clustering (ie non backref'd grouping)

2001-02-08 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/8/01 5:54 AM, "Michael McCallum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have started using the regexp package because is nice and lightweight but > found I could not use clustering. I think it might be a Perl extension to re > but found it was easy to implement in this package. Thanks, I will take

New Feature: Grouping histories...

2001-02-08 Thread Michael McCallum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was thinking it might be useful to get all of the matches for a repeated subexpression. eg (\w)(?:\s(\w)+)+ used to match a word list will return the following sub expression matches... Paren 0 = used to match a word list Paren 1 = used Pare