Böhringer Jochen wrote:
Does anybody know, if the jakarta regexp package will be maintained
in future or is it better to switch to another regexp package?
All (or almost all - one patch which introduces new feature is pending) patches
that ever came into the Regexp bugzilla found it's way into the
thur J. D'Alessandro III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 5. April 2005 13:05
> To: Regexp Users List
> Subject: RE: Regex Problem
>
> Why not use a simpler validation. String length... It's easy, and works
> both on the client side (using javascript) and on the b
Guten Tag Herr Bédert,
genau mit demselben Problem habe ich mich einige Zeit vor ihnen an die
Mailingliste gewandt. Leider kam auch kein "konstruktives" Feedback.
Der Workaround mit diesem regulären Ausdruck:
RE re = new RE("(.{0,128}){0,32}");
funktioniert bei mir allerdings.
Welcher Fehler tr
Why not use a simpler validation. String length... It's easy, and works both
on the client side (using javascript) and on the backend.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:53 AM
To: regexp-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: R
