On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> >> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I
> >> agree with Frank and would go a step further. While the
> >> document indicates that IRIS was not actually deployed for
> >> address registry usage,
Hi,
I published the revised draft-ietf-regext-change-poll based on the feedback
received during the WGLC. Please provide any additional feedback on the list.
Thanks,
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Hi,
I published the revised draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token based on the
feedback received during the WGLC. Please provide any additional feedback on
the list.
Thanks,
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Allocation Token Extension for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Authors : James
--On Monday, January 29, 2018 10:11 -0800 Ted Hardie
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying; I was returning from the QUIC
> meeting in Melbourne.
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:13 AM, John C Klensin
> wrote:
>> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55
Sorry for the delay in replying; I was returning from the QUIC meeting in
Melbourne.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:13 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55 +0100 Frank Ellermann
> wrote:
>
> > On 22