Re: [regext] Final review of draft-ietf-regext-org-06

Dear Pieter, I am updating the draft-ietf-regext-org. Some of your suggestions will be modified in the 07 version. Some will be keep as it is now. Please see my feedbacks below. Regards, Linlin zhoulin...@cnnic.cn From: Linlin Zhou Date: 2018-05-25 09:23 To: Pieter Vandepitte; jgould CC:

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, at 19:56, Gould, James wrote: > 4. I don’t recommend directly referencing the > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:contact-1.0 elements, since it adds a direct > dependency to inclusion of the contact XML schema and namespace for a > subset of the elements that are really specific

[regext] Last Call: (Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Object Tagging) to Best Current Practice

The IESG has received a request from the Registration Protocols Extensions WG (regext) to consider the following document: - 'Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Object Tagging' as Best Current Practice The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

On 6/5/18 8:39 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Roach Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 7:32 PM To: regext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-...@tools.ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag I've reviewed the document

Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gould-regext-login-security-00.txt

Patrick and Pieter, Thanks for your review of the extension and your feedback. I include comments to the feedback below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 6/5/18,

Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gould-regext-login-security-00.txt

Patrick, Thanks for your review of the extension and your feedback. I include comments to the feedback below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 6/5/18, 1:32 AM,

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

> -Original Message- > From: Adam Roach > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 7:32 PM > To: regext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag > > I've reviewed the document draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag in >

Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gould-regext-login-security-00.txt

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, at 09:26, Pieter Vandepitte wrote: > I follow the concerns of Patrick, > > I'm neither a fan of the [LOGIN-SECURITY]. Isn't it enough to specify > that a server MUST ignore the value of if the loginSec extension is > used? That could be a solution too, and would work

Re: [regext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gould-regext-login-security-00.txt

I follow the concerns of Patrick, I'm neither a fan of the [LOGIN-SECURITY]. Isn't it enough to specify that a server MUST ignore the value of if the loginSec extension is used? I don't know if I overlooked it, but it seems that there's only support for password based login and provisioning.