Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Gurshabad Grover
On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > [...] > In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is > being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the > organization or the community and was very controversial at the time of > publication.

Re: [regext] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Gustavo Lozano
I support adoption and willing to review. > -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 08:04 > To: Registration Protocols Extensions > Subject: [Ext] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse- > search > > Hi

Re: [regext] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging

2019-01-24 Thread Gustavo Lozano
I support adoption and willing to review. > -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 08:04 > To: Registration Protocols Extensions > Subject: [Ext] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-sorting-and- > paging > >

Re: [regext] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-login-security

2019-01-24 Thread Gustavo Lozano
I support adoption and willing to review. > -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 08:04 > To: Registration Protocols Extensions > Subject: [Ext] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-login-security > > Hi all, > > As

Re: [regext] [Ext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-partial-response

2019-01-24 Thread Gustavo Lozano
I support adoption and willing to review. > -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 08:04 > To: Registration Protocols Extensions > Subject: [Ext] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-partial- > response > > Hi

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >I totally agree with John here: let's await what comes out of the ICANN EPDP >and see whether this is actually something that is >warranted and build it to that spec. Please stop trying to put words in my mouth. Regardless of what comes out of the ICANN EPDP, this

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-login-security

2019-01-24 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 11:04, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > This is a formal adoption request for draft-gould-regext-login-security > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-login-security/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Andy Newton
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 02:44:16PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote: > Hi all, > > Il 24/01/2019 13:19, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 5:37 AM > > > To: regext@ietf.org > > >

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-login-security

2019-01-24 Thread Martin Casanova
I support adoption and am willing contribute input I might have while implementing this draft. MC On 18.01.19 17:04, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people > most want to be added to our milestone list. > To be able to

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi all, Il 24/01/2019 13:19, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 5:37 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext- rdap-reverse-search On

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Gavin Brown
I support adoption of this document. On 18/01/2019 16:04, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people > most want to be added to our milestone list. > To be able to to that the documents should first be adopted as working

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-partial-response

2019-01-24 Thread Gavin Brown
I support adoption of this document. On 18/01/2019 16:03, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people > most want to be added to our milestone list. > To be able to to that the documents should first be adopted as working

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 5:37 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext- > rdap-reverse-search > > > > On 1/23/19 8:26 PM, John Levine wrote: > > In

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Niels ten Oever
On 1/23/19 8:26 PM, John Levine wrote: > In article <0f07073e-9e96-3dee-2c39-9aef91dc9...@digitaldissidents.org> you > write: >> There is also no limitation or specific use defined, which makes this >> protocol in direct violation of with the GDPR. > > I'm sorry, but that assertion is not

Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search

2019-01-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Andy, my comments below. Il 23/01/2019 21:31, Andy Newton ha scritto: Mario, My response is in-line On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:15:02PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi Andy, thanks for your feedback. My comments are below. Il 23/01/2019 16:30, Andy Newton ha scritto: On Fri, Jan 18,