[regext] rfc7484bis feedback

2021-02-21 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Marc, I reviewed rfc7484bis for the shepherd doc and noted the following. Thanks, Jasdip --- Overall: Should we mention in both the Abstract and Introduction sections that this doc obsoletes RFC 7484? RFC 8259 obsoletes RFC 7159 for the JSON format. Throughout the doc, it would be

Re: [regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-21 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Scott, Please find my comment below. Jasdip On 2/18/21, 11:13 AM, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 3:30 AM > To: The IESG > Cc:

[regext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces

2021-02-21 Thread Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
Reviewer: Tirumaleswar Reddy Review result: Has nits This document does not define any new EPP protocol elements, it specifies an operational practice using the existing EPP protocol. It does not discuss any security aspects other than relying on the security considerations in EPP protocol