Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary

+1 with name change On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, 12:27 am James Galvin, wrote: > This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

+1 From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 7:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 You don't often get email from ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org. Learn why this is

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary

It appears that James Galvin said: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ My only objection is that the name needs to change to something like Registrar Data Dictionary since the only items in it that have anything to do with the DNS are 2.1 and 2.3.

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

+1 From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 7:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 You don't often get email from ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org. Learn why this is

Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

I support. Thanks Rick From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Date: Monday, December 20, 2021 at 8:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. Don’t trust emails, links,

[regext] Confusion around non-uniqueness of nameserver objects

Hi all, I was recently contacted by an otherwise clueful person who was confused because an RDAP query for a particular nameserver object seemingly showed the wrong sponsoring registrar. Upon investigation, it was revealed that the nameserver in question was subordinate to domain in another

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary

+1 On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 3:27 PM James Galvin wrote: > This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by REGEXT and comment

[regext] The REGEXT WG has placed draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

The REGEXT WG has placed draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by James Galvin) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ ___ regext mailing

[regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary

This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to the list, clearly stating your view. This Call For

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

Hello, On 12/20/21 14:55, Antoin Verschuren wrote: Dear WG, This WGLC will end tonight, and so far we only have 2 explicit voices of support. This is a bit low to declare consensus. Could more people voice their support? +1 -- TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

Dear wg, In my technical opinion, the main idea behind the draft to include EAI in the e-mail addresses of the EPP commands is very well received. I think that this draft is not only important to advance internationalization issues in the world of domain names, but also for what is reverse DNS

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

Dear WG, This WGLC will end tonight, and so far we only have 2 explicit voices of support. This is a bit low to declare consensus. Could more people voice their support? Scott, can you confirm that the changes in version 05 address your initial concerns? - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6,