Re: [regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-23

2023-08-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
AD review: I note that the shepherd writeup's last question points out the creation of a registry using Specification Required rules, and thus doesn't need a designated expert, referencing RFC 8126 Section 4.6. However, that section of that RFC says: This policy is the same as Expert Review,

Re: [regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-13

2023-08-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
AD evaluation: Thanks, Andy, for a good shepherd writeup. It would be helpful, even if it seems redundant or obvious, to include an answer to the question about why Proposed Standard is the right status for this document. The first paragraph of Section 3 is a bit confusing; it says you MUST NOT

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search Feedback

2023-08-12 Thread Jasdip Singh
Thanks for your feedback, James. And, sorry for the late reply. As for point #2, Section 6 gives the rationale for choosing “ips” over “_ips” (and similarly, “autnums” over ““_autnums”) for these new search path segments: “Because IP network objects and autonomous system number objects are