Re: [regext] Redacted registry implementations

2023-12-14 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Hello Marc, we're working on an implementation for our gTLD registries, but there's no "running service" available yet. We might have something available in 2-3 months time, at which point I'm happy to come back to you again to run your clients against our "test" implementation. Best, Alex

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-14 Thread Hugo Salgado
Dear Gavin. Thanks for including the clarifications for the host-as-attributes model! I reviewed the document and found two problems: - in 1.2 second point, and in 1.2.2 second paragraph, the reference to "Section 1.3 of [RFC6895]" for the record type format is wrong. There's no 1.3 section.

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-14 Thread Gavin Brown
Greetings all, I have just uploaded draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04. Notable changes in this version: * The "for" attribute is now an enumeration, and can take the following values: NS, DS, DNAME, A, , custom. * If the "for" attribute is "custom", then the "custom" attribute can be used to

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-14 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF. Title: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values Author: Gavin Brown Name:

[regext] Redacted registry implementations

2023-12-14 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, As I’m currently working on a new version of RDAP Browser (a mobile RDAP client on iOS and Android), I would like to know if some registries (either domain or RIR) have or are about to implement draft-ietf-regext-redacted as it is on its way to RFC. I would like to test my client on