Re: [regext] [Ext] TTL extension for RDAP

2024-01-05 Thread Andrew Newton
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:04 AM Gavin Brown wrote: > So something like this? I've also thrown in min/default/max values as well: > > "ttl": [ > { > "types": ["NS", "DELEG"], > "value": 3600, > "min": 60, // optional > "default": 86400, // optional > "max": 172800, //

Re: [regext] [Ext] TTL extension for RDAP

2024-01-05 Thread Gould, James
Gavin & Andy, The TTL RDAP extension is now getting more complex with no defined value provided for the extension. I have a set of questions included below: 1. Are there any ccTLDs or RIRs (non-EPP) that have the value position for replicating the TTL information in RDAP? Please provide a

Re: [regext] [Ext] TTL extension for RDAP

2024-01-05 Thread Gavin Brown
Hi Andy, > On 4 Jan 2024, at 14:22, Andrew Newton wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:20 AM Gavin Brown wrote: >> >> Do you think the ttl_values object needs an events array then? >> >> To support this I would change the ttl_values object as follows: >> >> "ttl": { >> "values": { >> "NS":