8:34 AM
To: Jasdip Singh , Rick Wilhelm , Andy
Newton
Cc: Marc Blanchet , "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition
Hi Jasdip and others,
I strongly apologize for replying to this post with big delay but I have been
very busy with JSContact and
Cc: Marc Blanchet , "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition
Hi Jasdip and others,
I strongly apologize for replying to this post with big delay but I have been
very busy with JSContact and reverse search docs and other business from .
ietf.org"
*Subject: *Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition
Hi Rick,
please find my comments below.
Il 01/04/2023 03:03, Rick Wilhelm ha scritto:
I think that I’m leaning towards Andy’s approach, but I haven’t
soak this thinking for very long.
Perhaps it’s
Hi Andy,
please find my responses below.
Il 10/04/2023 15:32, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
Comments below.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:16 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
Hi Andy,
Il 06/04/2023 16:36, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:56 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
[ML] Sorry for the del
Comments below.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:16 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Il 06/04/2023 16:36, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:56 AM Mario Loffredo
> > wrote:
> >> [ML] Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for this.
> >>
> >> Really there are some docume
Hi Andy,
Il 06/04/2023 16:36, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:56 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
[ML] Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for this.
Really there are some documents under discussion that would be
eventually affected.
But I wonder where it's stated that query
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:56 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
>
>
>
> [ML] Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for this.
>
> Really there are some documents under discussion that would be
> eventually affected.
>
> But I wonder where it's stated that query parameters should/must not be
> preserved i
Il 04/04/2023 18:48, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:18 PM Jasdip Singh wrote:
Hi.
If the response size increase is not a concern when both jCard and JSContact
objects are returned for some time, it seems Andy’s proposal (option 3) is the
way to go. IMO, it keeps things
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:18 PM Jasdip Singh wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>
>
> If the response size increase is not a concern when both jCard and JSContact
> objects are returned for some time, it seems Andy’s proposal (option 3) is
> the way to go. IMO, it keeps things simple without having to worry about
:32 AM
*To: *Rick Wilhelm , Andy Newton
*Cc: *Marc Blanchet , "regext@ietf.org"
*Subject: *Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition
Hi Rick,
please find my comments below.
Il 01/04/2023 03:03, Rick Wilhelm ha scritto:
I think that I’m leaning towards Andy’s ap
unilaterally with sufficient
forewarning to clients.
Jasdip
From: regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo
Date: Monday, April 3, 2023 at 5:32 AM
To: Rick Wilhelm , Andy Newton
Cc: Marc Blanchet , "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition
Hi Ric
Hi Tim,
please find my response in my replies to Andy's and Rick's post.
Best,
Mario
Il 01/04/2023 03:13, Tim Wicinski ha scritto:
Since it appears that code changes will need to be done for JContact,
the simpler proposal will be number 3.
Bytes are less expensive than making additional r
Hi Rick,
please find my comments below.
Il 01/04/2023 03:03, Rick Wilhelm ha scritto:
I think that I’m leaning towards Andy’s approach, but I haven’t soak
this thinking for very long.
Perhaps it’s useful to go back to one of the original motivations for
the draft.
As I recall, programmer
Since it appears that code changes will need to be done for JContact, the
simpler proposal will be number 3.
Bytes are less expensive than making additional requests. (for the most
part)
tim
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:03 PM Rick Wilhelm wrote:
> I think that I’m leaning towards Andy’s approach
I think that I’m leaning towards Andy’s approach, but I haven’t soak this
thinking for very long.
Perhaps it’s useful to go back to one of the original motivations for the draft.
As I recall, programmers, especially client-side, have been known to have
difficulty with JCard (for various reasons
15 matches
Mail list logo
