Hi Jim, thanks for your feedback. My comments are below.
> On 22 Nov 2023, at 19:43, Gould, James wrote:
>
> Gavin,
> Thank you for posting draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-03. Below is my review
> feedback:
>
> • Section 1.2 “Extension elements”
> • Nit – I would change “It has a
Gavin,
Thank you for posting draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-03. Below is my review
feedback:
1. Section 1.2 “Extension elements”
* Nit – I would change “It has a single REQUIRED attribute, for, which
specifies the DNS record type to which the TTL value pertains” to “It has a
single
Hi all,
As discussed in Prague, I have uploaded a new version of
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl.
Notable changes:
1. Rolled back the "straw man" syntax from 02. ttl:ttl now has a for
attribute which can be any DNS record type. Section 1.2.2
describes how the set of supported record types may be
