Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2024-01-26 Thread Gavin Brown
Hi Jim, apologies for the delayed response. > On 20 Dec 2023, at 15:26, Gould, James > wrote: > > Gavin, > > Thanks for making the updates in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04. I went ahead > and implemented draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04 in the Verisign EPP SDK that > implements a client and a

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-20 Thread Gould, James
Gavin, Thanks for making the updates in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04. I went ahead and implemented draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04 in the Verisign EPP SDK that implements a client and a server. I did find the following issue: The “commandTTLType“ is missing the optional “custom” attribute

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-14 Thread Hugo Salgado
Dear Gavin. Thanks for including the clarifications for the host-as-attributes model! I reviewed the document and found two problems: - in 1.2 second point, and in 1.2.2 second paragraph, the reference to "Section 1.3 of [RFC6895]" for the record type format is wrong. There's no 1.3 section.

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04.txt

2023-12-14 Thread Gavin Brown
Greetings all, I have just uploaded draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-04. Notable changes in this version: * The "for" attribute is now an enumeration, and can take the following values: NS, DS, DNAME, A, , custom. * If the "for" attribute is "custom", then the "custom" attribute can be used to