Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-02-29 Thread Gavin Brown
Hi Jim, thanks for this - I've reviewed and agree, and will publish a -06 version some time soon which reflects this approach. Cheers, Gavin. > On 7 Feb 2024, at 21:17, Gould, James wrote: > > Gavin, > > My feedback is included below. > > -- > > JG > > > > James Gould > Fellow

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-02-07 Thread Gould, James
Gavin, My feedback is included below. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 2/7/24, 12:43 PM, "Gavin Brown" mailto:gavin.br...@icann.org>> wrote: Caution: This email

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-02-07 Thread Gavin Brown
Hi Jim, Thanks for this feedback. Am I correct in saying that in your view, if a server receives an unextended command (on a session where the TTL extension was included in an element in the frame) then the response should not include the element in the response? If that's the case,

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-02-07 Thread Gavin Brown
Thanks Hugo, this will be fixed. > On 31 Jan 2024, at 15:41, Hugo Salgado wrote: > > Dear Gavin. > One of the errors that I indicated in a previous email for version 04 > is still in this version: > > - in 1.2.1 second point, and in 1.2.1.2 second paragraph, the reference > to "Section 1.3 of

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-01-31 Thread Gould, James
Gavin, Thanks for making the updates to draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05. I did find one issue with the XML schema, where needs to be . I would prefer making the "policy" attribute optional with a default value of "false", as in: I would then change the description in section 1.3 to be: It

Re: [regext] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-05.txt

2024-01-29 Thread Gavin Brown
Hi all, This version updates the extension with Jim's feedback, so that the min/default/max attributes on elements are only included in responses if the client includes in the command. I haven't received much feedback other than Jim's, so apart from fixing any minor issues that may be