Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Thanks, Antoin. Please note that I am going to release v14 to address Jim Gould’s feedback to raise the XML namespace from 0.3 to 1.0 after successful WGLC. Tobias > On 19. Apr 2021, at 15:27, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > > Working group Last Call for this document ended last Monday. > We are

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Working group Last Call for this document ended last Monday. We are happy to see that we finally got 7 participants in favour, and no objections to this draft. This means that we are now ready submit this document to the IESG. We see that the authors have already submitted a version -13 for this

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

I support this moving forward as well. > On Apr 15, 2021, at 06:16, Gould, James > wrote: > > Antoin, > > All of my feedback has been addressed in > draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance and I support it moving forward. > > -- > > JG > > > > James Gould > Fellow Engineer >

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Antoin, All of my feedback has been addressed in draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance and I support it moving forward. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 3/29/21,

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi all, On 12.04.2021 15:48, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a reminder that this 2nd WGLC will end tonight! > We still don’t seem to have enough consensus, so please state your > support. Also if you have responded to the first WGLC. I'm not sure if my comment from 2020-03-30

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

of maintenance emails that arrive constantly. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jody Kolker. From: regext On Behalf Of Marcel Parodi Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:40 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi Antoin, I support the document's submission. Thanks Quoc -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2021 12:21 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance Caution: This email

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi Tobias, inline On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:22 AM Tobias Sattler wrote: > Thanks, Joseph. > > Please see our comments inline. > > Tobias > > On 11. Apr 2021, at 18:25, Joseph Yee wrote: > > Hi Antoin and everyone, > > I reviewed the -12 draft and support the publication. > > Two (very) minor

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

For some time now, I’ve been wondering whether it’s a good idea to choose the EPP service as a channel to provide information about maintenance windows of an unspecified set of services. After reading last weeks discussion here on the mailing list, it seems rather unrealistic to me, that this

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi all, This is a reminder that this 2nd WGLC will end tonight! We still don’t seem to have enough consensus, so please state your support. Also if you have responded to the first WGLC. Regards, Jim and Antoin > Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren het > volgende

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Thanks, Joseph. Please see our comments inline. Tobias > On 11. Apr 2021, at 18:25, Joseph Yee wrote: > > Hi Antoin and everyone, > > I reviewed the -12 draft and support the publication. > > Two (very) minor changes suggested: > > (1) > Section 3.3 > > The OPTIONAL URI to detailed

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi Antoin and everyone, I reviewed the -12 draft and support the publication. Two (very) minor changes suggested: (1) Section 3.3 The OPTIONAL URI to detailed maintenance description. It's clear what URI is, but should still need to reference it with the according RFCs. (2) Section 5.1 The

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hi Antoin, I've reviewed the document and support its submission to the RFC Editor queue. G. > On 29 Mar 2021, at 13:49, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > > The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission > to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: > >

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

ave any questions or comments. Thanks, Jody Kolker -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Thomas Corte (TANGO support) Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 6:31 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance Hello, On 3/29/21 14

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Hello, On 3/29/21 14:49, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission > to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/ > > EXTRA ATTENTION:

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12 > Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren het > volgende geschreven: > > The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission > to the IESG for

[regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/ EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During the first WGLC,