Hi all,
I hope all the WG members could take the time to review and give the
authors any feedback. All suggestions are very welcome.
Regards,
mario
Il 01/02/2019 14:46, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
Dear WG,
The call for adoption for draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search
ended 25
[chair hat off]
I didn’t want to influence this call for adoption with my personal opinion, but
I do have a use case that I think is important to consider.
According to the GDRP, any individual has a right to make a request to an
entity that gathers data to have insight in what data is stored
Dear WG,
The call for adoption for draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search ended 25
Januari 2019.
The results were:
Support: 8
Object: 1
The chairs decision to adopt requires some explanation:
Adopting work to our working group does not mean a draft will automatically be
approved
Hi all
> On Jan 25, 2019, at 18:21, Niels ten Oever
> wrote:
>
> I fully agree that the IETF does not need to restrict its protocols to the
> legislations of one geographical area. But I think the IETF should help
> implementers to not violate the human rights of end-users, and consider
Hi Thomas,
On 1/25/19 4:18 PM, Thomas Corte wrote:
> Hello Niels,
>
> On 1/25/19 15:39, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>
>> But if the IETF produces protocols which are non-GDPR compliant upon
>> implementation, and are violating human rights, that is imho not something
>> we should want.
>
> Why
Il 25/01/2019 15:39, Niels ten Oever ha scritto:
On 1/25/19 3:28 PM, John R Levine wrote:
The final decision on this is planned to be made in April:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88574682=/88574682/102142026/EPDP_summary_timeline_20190116.pdf
Not that it's
Hello Niels,
On 1/25/19 15:39, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> But if the IETF produces protocols which are non-GDPR compliant upon
> implementation, and are violating human rights, that is imho not something we
> should want.
Why should the IETF, a *global* organization, restrict its protocols to
Hi Andy,
Il 25/01/2019 16:02, Andy Newton ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0530, Gurshabad Grover wrote:
On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
[...]
In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is
being cited to legitimize this approach has not
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0530, Gurshabad Grover wrote:
> On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> > [...]
> > In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is
> > being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the
> > organization
On 1/25/19 3:28 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>> The final decision on this is planned to be made in April:
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88574682=/88574682/102142026/EPDP_summary_timeline_20190116.pdf
>
> Not that it's relevant here, but I am a member of the ICANN
The final decision on this is planned to be made in April:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88574682=/88574682/102142026/EPDP_summary_timeline_20190116.pdf
Not that it's relevant here, but I am a member of the ICANN SSAC
subcommittee that supports the SSAC reps on the
On 1/25/19 3:14 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>> If a registrant is living in the EU, or a EU citizen, they would be covered
>> by GDPR protections, so its impact is quite significant. As you know, ICANN
>> and the industry is seeking to find one compliance model. I do not see why
>> we would
If a registrant is living in the EU, or a EU citizen, they would be covered by
GDPR protections, so its impact is quite significant. As you know, ICANN and
the industry is seeking to find one compliance model. I do not see why we would
deviate from that.
I pretty sure nothing has changed
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> ...
I support adoption and am willing to contribute/review.
-Tom
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
On 1/24/19 7:15 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article you
> write:
>> I totally agree with John here: let's await what comes out of the ICANN EPDP
>> and see whether this is actually something that is
>> warranted and build it to that spec.
>
> Please stop trying to put words in my mouth.
>
On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> [...]
> In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is
> being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the
> organization or the community and was very controversial at the time of
> publication.
In article you
write:
>I totally agree with John here: let's await what comes out of the ICANN EPDP
>and see whether this is actually something that is
>warranted and build it to that spec.
Please stop trying to put words in my mouth.
Regardless of what comes out of the ICANN EPDP, this
; > > To: regext@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-
> > > rdap-reverse-search
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/23/19 8:26 PM, John Levine wrote:
> > > > In article <
Hi all,
Il 24/01/2019 13:19, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
-Original Message-
From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 5:37 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-
rdap-reverse-search
On 1/23
I support adoption of this document.
On 18/01/2019 16:04, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people
> most want to be added to our milestone list.
> To be able to to that the documents should first be adopted as working
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 5:37 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-
> rdap-reverse-search
>
>
>
> On 1/23
On 1/23/19 8:26 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <0f07073e-9e96-3dee-2c39-9aef91dc9...@digitaldissidents.org> you
> write:
>> There is also no limitation or specific use defined, which makes this
>> protocol in direct violation of with the GDPR.
>
> I'm sorry, but that assertion is not
Hi Andy,
my comments below.
Il 23/01/2019 21:31, Andy Newton ha scritto:
Mario,
My response is in-line
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:15:02PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
Hi Andy,
thanks for your feedback. My comments are below.
Il 23/01/2019 16:30, Andy Newton ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 18,
Mario,
My response is in-line
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:15:02PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> thanks for your feedback. My comments are below.
>
> Il 23/01/2019 16:30, Andy Newton ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
In article <0f07073e-9e96-3dee-2c39-9aef91dc9...@digitaldissidents.org> you
write:
>There is also no limitation or specific use defined, which makes this protocol
>in direct violation of with the GDPR.
I'm sorry, but that assertion is not even wrong.
The GDPR affects entities that process or
Hi Andy,
thanks for your feedback. My comments are below.
Il 23/01/2019 16:30, Andy Newton ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people most
want to be added to our milestone
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people
> most want to be added to our milestone list.
> To be able to to that the documents should first be adopted as working group
> documents.
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:55:31PM +0100, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>
> I strongly object to the adoption of this document as it currently stands.
>
> In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is
> being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN
On 1/23/19 1:37 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:04 AM
>> To: Registration Protocols Extensions
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-lo
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:04 AM
> To: Registration Protocols Extensions
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Call for adoption: draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-
> reverse-search
>
>
I support its adoption.
Kind regards,
Maurizio Martinelli
Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno 18 gen 2019, alle ore 17:04, Antoin Verschuren ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people
> most want to be added to our milestone list.
> To
Hi all,
As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people most
want to be added to our milestone list.
To be able to to that the documents should first be adopted as working group
documents.
This is a formal adoption request for draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search
32 matches
Mail list logo
