+1000. Outside of some Skynet scenarios, I'm highly skeptical about
clients evolving behaviors on their own.
-andy
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:26 PM Jasdip Singh wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Very interesting discussion. :) Couple of inputs regarding the proposed
> discovery and IANA registration of reverse
Hi Mario,
Am 29.11.22 um 07:46 schrieb Mario Loffredo:
Hi Pawel,
Il 28/11/2022 22:02, Pawel Kowalik ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
My comment inline.
Am 28.11.22 um 21:20 schrieb Mario Loffredo:
"A custom reverse search property MUST NOT collide with a
registered reverse
search property and MUST N
Hi Jasdip,
thanks for joining the discussion.
I have always been much more in favor of providing self-descriptive REST
APIs (i.e. the HATOAS approach) rather than using a centralized
registry. Therefore, I have always preferred metadata discovery over
registration.
However, I admit that the
Hi Tom,
my comments below.
Il 28/11/2022 23:36, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:19:20PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
Il 27/11/2022 22:49, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:18:35PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
Even now there is no real way to p
Hi Pawel,
Il 28/11/2022 22:02, Pawel Kowalik ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
My comment inline.
Am 28.11.22 um 21:20 schrieb Mario Loffredo:
"A custom reverse search property MUST NOT collide with a
registered reverse
search property and MUST NOT match an RDAP property, or any of its
variants,
match
Hi.
Very interesting discussion. :) Couple of inputs regarding the proposed
discovery and IANA registration of reverse search properties:
In the spirit of what-not-to-do, is it really necessary to evolve reverse
search this way? As long as each registered extension identifier (current and
futu
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:19:20PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> Il 27/11/2022 22:49, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:18:35PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
>>> Even now there is no real way to prevent collisions since
>>> extension identifiers and JSON values are n
Hi Mario,
My comment inline.
Am 28.11.22 um 21:20 schrieb Mario Loffredo:
"A custom reverse search property MUST NOT collide with a
registered reverse
search property and MUST NOT match an RDAP property, or any of its
variants,
matched by a registered reverse search property."
[PK] not sure a
Hi Pawel,
please find my comments below.
Il 28/11/2022 07:54, Pawel Kowalik ha scritto:
Hi,
My comments below.
Am 27.11.22 um 22:49 schrieb Tom Harrison:
[...]
I still think that custom properties are useful for the reasons above.
On the other hand, their possible misuse should be ruled so
Hi Tom,
please find my comments below prefixed with ML3.
Il 27/11/2022 22:49, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:18:35PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
Il 24/11/2022 13:46, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
This is the part I (still) don't follow, sorry. The fact that the
la
Hi,
My comments below.
Am 27.11.22 um 22:49 schrieb Tom Harrison:
[...]
I still think that custom properties are useful for the reasons above.
On the other hand, their possible misuse should be ruled somehow.
Here in the following a possible statement limiting the scope of custom
properties:
Hi Mario,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:18:35PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> Il 24/11/2022 13:46, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
>> This is the part I (still) don't follow, sorry. The fact that the
>> label is a JSON value in the "reverse_search_properties" member of
>> the help response does not mean t
Hi Tom,
please see my comments below prefixed by [ML2]
Il 24/11/2022 13:46, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
Il 22/11/2022 14:00, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
With r
Hi Mario,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> Il 22/11/2022 14:00, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
>>> With regard to the registration of the reverse search properties,
>>> I have opted for adding entries in
Hi Tom,
thank you for your feedback.
Please find my comments below.
Il 22/11/2022 14:00, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
With regard to the registration of the reverse search properties, I
have opted for adding entries in the
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> With regard to the registration of the reverse search properties, I
> have opted for adding entries in the RDAP JSON Values registry
> rather than defining an ad-hoc registry.
>
> That is because servers must include the
Hi all,
this new version addresses last Pawel's feedback.
With regard to the registration of the reverse search properties, I have
opted for adding entries in the RDAP JSON Values registry rather than
defining an ad-hoc registry.
That is because servers must include the reverse search proper
17 matches
Mail list logo
