ubject: Re: [regext] RDAP reverse search draft feedback
1. Why introduce the keyword “reverse” in the search path? Is it to
distinguish from the related reverse search scenarios (e.g. domains by nsIp)
defined in 7843bis? In light of introducing a new extension for this draft, the
“reverse” k
Hi Jansdip,
thansk so much for your feedback. I'm finally happy to focus on
technical aspects.
I provide my comments to your feedback below.
Il 31/07/2020 21:01, Jasdip Singh ha scritto:
Hello Mario, Scott,
Please find my feedback on
Hello Mario, Scott,
Please find my feedback on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/ below:
1. Agree with the overall usefulness of this draft to cover the
missing/needed search scenarios.
2. Not sure if we need to specifically mention in the draft but
