Hello, In ยง5.2.5, the example shows a pure domain:update changing in fact the registrant of the domain, but with a fee extension. This could be technically possible, and some registries may decide one day to make this operation billable.
However it is clearly not the common case and the spirit is more towards the restore operation, carried through a domain:update, to be done with the fee extension. Could maybe the XML example shown be of a true restore operation instead of a pure domain:update ? (especially since the introduction clearly speaks about the RGP restore command, and not the update command) -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
