[regext] Registration Protocols Extensions (regext) WG Virtual Meeting: 2017-10-11

[IESG Secretary]

The Registration Protocols Extensions (regext) Working Group will hold
a virtual interim meeting on 2017-10-11 from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC.

Agenda:
We plan to discuss items around the latest versions of the Fee draft and of the 
Validate draft.
 
Agenda

1. Fee
 a. Confirm Edits (section 3.8 and section 4.0)
 b. Discuss WG Last Call

2. Validate
 a. A validate/verification framework discussion
 b. Validate group processing of contacts


Information about remote participation:
https://godaddy.zoom.us/j/364924339

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

[Roger D Carney]

Good Morning,

This sounds like a productive process.


Thanks
Roger


From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 7:31 AM
To: 'i...@antoin.nl' ; 'regext@ietf.org' 
Subject: Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Here's a thought: identify the milestone documents for which there has been no 
discussion, no progress, and no requests for meeting time slots. Schedule 
meeting time to talk about removing them as milestones so we can make room for 
other documents.

Scott

From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:14 AM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Hi all,

So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items.
With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an Interim 
meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have enough topics to 
justify a full working session during IETF100.
This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate working session.

We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time 
will be dedicated to working items.
Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?

Jim and Antoin

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392




Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney 
> het volgende geschreven:

Good Morning,

I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working session:

  *   The Validate draft
  *   Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing

And for updates:

  *   Fee
  *   Validate
  *   Interim Meetings


Thanks
Roger


-Original Message-
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions >
Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Dear Working group,

It's time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore.
To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2 questions for you

1. Please submit agenda items to the list.
2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for your item.

Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please submit your 
discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if:

1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and only need 1 
update session.
2. We need both a working session and a short update session for IETF 100.
3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session.

Thanx,

Jim and Antoin

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

[Mario Loffredo]

I agree with Scott.

Mario

Il 26/09/2017 14:31, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:


Here’s a thought: identify the milestone documents for which there has 
been no discussion, no progress, and no requests for meeting time 
slots. Schedule meeting time to talk about removing them as milestones 
so we can make room for other documents.


Scott

*From:* regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Antoin 
Verschuren

*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:14 AM
*To:* Registration Protocols Extensions 
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Hi all,

So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items.

With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an 
Interim meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have 
enough topics to justify a full working session during IETF100.


This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate 
working session.


We will probably opt for one longer update session where the 
additional time will be dedicated to working items.


Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?

Jim and Antoin

- -- 
Antoin Verschuren


Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392

Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney > het volgende geschreven:




Good Morning,

I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working
session:

  * The Validate draft
  * Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing

And for updates:

  * Fee
  * Validate
  * Interim Meetings

Thanks

Roger

-Original Message-
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin
Verschuren
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions >
Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Dear Working group,

It’s time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore.

To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2
questions for you

1. Please submit agenda items to the list.

2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for
your item.

Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please
submit your discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if:

1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and
only need 1 update session.

2. We need both a working session and a short update session for
IETF 100.

3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session.

Thanx,

Jim and Antoin

- --

Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL

M: +31 6 37682392

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext



___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext



--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Servizi Internet e Sviluppo Tecnologico
CNR - Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
E-Mail: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Phone: +39 050 3153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

[Antoin Verschuren]

Hi all,

So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items.
With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an Interim 
meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have enough topics to 
justify a full working session during IETF100.
This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate working session.

We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time 
will be dedicated to working items.
Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?

Jim and Antoin

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney  het 
volgende geschreven:

> Good Morning,
> 
> I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working session:
> The Validate draft
> Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing
> 
> And for updates:
> Fee
> Validate
> Interim Meetings
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Roger
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM
> To: Registration Protocols Extensions 
> Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100
> 
> Dear Working group,
> 
> It’s time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore.
> To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2 questions for you
> 
> 1. Please submit agenda items to the list.
> 2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for your item.
> 
> Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please submit your 
> discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if:
> 
> 1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and only need 1 
> update session.
> 2. We need both a working session and a short update session for IETF 100.
> 3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session.
> 
> Thanx,
> 
> Jim and Antoin
> 
> - --
> Antoin Verschuren
> 
> Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
> M: +31 6 37682392
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext