On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, at 15:02, Gould, James wrote:
> JG - I don't view the 8 minimum as a "sacred cow" that would require the
> next iteration of the extension to increase it.
It was 6 before and apparently we "need" to upgrade to 8 now.
I am quite sure than in 5 years we would want to increase
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, at 14:21, Gould, James wrote:
> This dependency
> does require ensuring that the host XML schema is loaded ahead of the
> domain XML schema when pre-caching the XML schemas.
So it seems having dependencies is only a problem or a difficulty when
validating the frames per the
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, at 15:51, James Galvin wrote:
> As we have discussed in at least the last two IETF meetings, we would
> like to propose broadening the responsibility of this working group to
> cover the standards related generally to Internet Identifier systems.
I am sorry not to have been
Hi Adam (and the list),
Since my last email, I've updated rdap.org so that it uses the bootstrap
registries. So a query to https://rdap.org/{domain,ip,autnum}/{handle}
will redirect to the correct RDAP service (as long as that service is in
the bootstrap files).
Once the object tag registry is up
As we have discussed in at least the last two IETF meetings, we would
like to propose broadening the responsibility of this working group to
cover the standards related generally to Internet Identifier systems.
Attached you will find a proposed revision to our charter that would
allow this.
Antoin,
I would like to add an agenda item to introduce and discuss the new Login
Security EPP Extension.
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Antoin Verschuren
mailto:i...@antoin.nl>> wrote:
Hi all,
Below you find our preliminary agenda for Montreal.
We still have some time
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready
for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as an
Informational Document:
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Extension for
Strict Bundling Registration
https://datatracker.ietf.org
Hi all,
Below you find our preliminary agenda for Montreal.
We still have some time left in our regular session to talk about new drafts or
requests for new work items, so if you want to discuss something, please let us
know:
Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 102, Montreal, CA, Ag
