Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping

2016-06-21 Thread Gustavo Lozano
I agree with Scott¹s comments. I agree with Jim Galvin¹s suggestion that this draft should be standards track. After these changes, I think that the draft should be ready for publication as an RFC. It's worth mentioning that this draft is important for the RDAP deployment efforts in the gTLD

[regext] Comments on draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date-01

2016-06-21 Thread Patrick Mevzek
Hello Gustavo, I'm implemented draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date-01 in my opensource EPP client. I have the following comments: - first, would it be possible to switch the document name from eppext to regext? It would be easier to track it since for now, it does not appear on