can,
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
afterwards to restore, or even failure of or
criticism on our industry diversity.
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 12 jan. 2017, om 19:36 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>
het volgende geschreven:
> Is anyone i
ler role
object) versus option D (generic role object for roles like
resellers/dns-operators/etc.).
Is there any progress or suggestion from the authors on this?
Do we need to make another call on the mailing list to get a clearer consensus
or discussion?
Do the authors want to do this themselves, or d
of things like a demo, hacking
session, compliance testing, or a reviewers meeting request you would like to
clarify during the meeting.
Please let us know before Friday, as that is our deadline for meeting sessions
requests.
regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB
opinion
on this mailinglist so Jim can summarize them in a response to the IESG.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 9 nov. 2016, om 14:41 heeft Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> het volgende
geschreven:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:19:4
updates or
discussions, please do! and let us know.
Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 97, Seoul, South Korea, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes)
i. Jabber scribe
ii. Notes scribe
iii
the
reseller object, as I think that may change the current text quite a bit..
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 7 dec. 2016, om 09:35 heeft Linlin Zhou <zhoulin...@cnnic.cn> het volgende
geschreven:
> This is a very minor
nal role in relation to
a provisioning object, so they can use the new service belonging with that role.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 3 mrt. 2017, om 16:12 heeft Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> het volgende
geschreven:
> I believe that “O
te the remote participation for this discussion.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
enough time.
Regards,
Antoin and Jim
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
98, Chicago, USA, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes)
i. Jabber scribe
ii. Notes scribe
iii. NOTE WELL
2. Existing Document Status
2.a. Published (2 minutes)
i. Extensible Provisioning
.
Using a more generic "organization” object, not tagging an organization as
a one and only role as a reseller will allow an entity to have multiple roles.
This will decrease data to be maintained by both registry and the
organizations involved.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 56
Hi Scott,
I’ll have a preliminary agenda and call for agenda items tomorrow, just waiting
for some private responses about the working session.
Stay tuned.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 1 mrt. 2017, om 19:57 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <sholl
eric phase discovery like the suggestion for a
Registry Mapping document.
We expect that this will be discussed during the interim meeting next
wednsesday.
Please comment if any of my conclusions on the consensus is incorrect.
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, N
d a new item to the milestones.
So we will start the formal adoption request for this document on the
mailinglist as soon as that’s done.
Since the launchphase document shepherd finished his writeup today, there are
only some nits left for the authors to fix, so I expect this to be this/next
week.
ssion?
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 24 jun. 2017, om 18:05 heeft Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> het
volgende geschreven:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> The latest revision, 05, of the fee draft was just posted.
>
> I wou
always add
them again later. But at least we will know what we are working on now, and we
could adopt new documents that do have traction.
We’re interested on your thoughts.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 19 mei 2017, om 17:01 heeft Roger D Carney
reads more like a problem statement with it’s proposed processes
to solve issues of inconvenience rather than a document that defines a BCP or
makes definitions.
I’d say there is still work to do, and I can probably help with some
definitions, but let’s first start the discussion on what
with one longer joint working/update session.
Thanx,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext
with one longer joint working/update session.
Thanx,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext
to the desire to have a seperate working session.
We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time
will be dedicated to working items.
Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op
James,
Jim and I were going to send out a formal WGLC on this document, but we didn’t
see a reply to this extensive review yet.
What do you want us to do, wait for you to have treated Patrick’s comments, or
consider them as part of WLC (Which may have a deadline)?
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin
didn’t miss anything, we will make an
additional WGLC.
Since it’s holiday season, this WGLC will end January 5th.
Please review the changes made to the document, and let us know before January
5th if you have any comments.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB
and Antoin
- --
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 23 nov. 2017, om 06:42 heeft Patrick Mevzek <p...@dotandco.com> het volgende
geschreven:
> Hello James and Kal,
>
> Here are my comments on the draft:
>
> The abstract
for adoption ends 20 December 2017.
If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the
chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 100, Singapore, Meeting minutes
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
Existing Documents
--
Launch Phase is in publication requested - all good so far.
Fee Extension (Roger Carney
Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 100, Singapore, Meeting minutes
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
Existing Documents
--
Launch Phase is in publication requested - all good so far.
Fee Extension (Roger Carney
command would show it, but a create or update could never
set it?) Or is this local policy and do we need to give guidance to registries
as to why, when and how to set this in a BCP?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 24 mei 2018, om 15:30 heeft Gould, James
not make things more orderly, and I could end up with a
number of organization objects for my 1 organization in the same registry..
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 25 mei 2018, om 22:38 heeft Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl> het vo
, and the rest of our meeting to these topics if someone is
willing to lead them.
So please let us know if you have any agenda items.
Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
___
regext mailing list
regext
, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
*
Session I, Work session.
?? 2h
1. Unhandled Namespaces (Jim Gould, 40 min.)
2. Registry Mapping (Roger Carney, 40 min.)
3. RDAP Search Capabilities and Authentication
discusion on the
mailinglist and we will also have an item on our agenda in Montreal to discuss.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 13 jun. 2018, om 23:39 heeft Andrew Newton het volgende
geschreven:
> Thanks for the clarification, Roger.
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token-08 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token
se case, I would agree with you.
It may look like overdesigning now if that were the only use case, but if we
don’t add structure now, it will be hard to go back once unstructured objects
are already populated.
We took the challenge of doing more work now, to have quicker innovation later.
And I
xtra work, but
third party dns-operators, ICANN related policy makers, RIR’s, registrants and
plain IETF protocol guardians also have an equal voice in the IETF process,
even though they don’t implement.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-03 as Best Current Practice on behalf of the
REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 25 mei 2018, om 17:25 heeft Roger D Carney het
volgende geschreven:
> Good Morning,
>
> Do we need to discuss our next documents in our regular meeting slot?
>
> For the regular meeting, I wou
Scott,
Sounds like an excellent idea.
Since it’s new work, I assume we would like to have that discussion in our
"work session”?, and Francisco is willing to lead that discussion?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 30 mei 2018, om 20:19
to the working session.
Please let us know what you think would be best.
-If there are any more agenda items, please let us know.
Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 100, Singapore, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
Update session, first hour
, did you get any feedback on attendance?
Regards,
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 13 dec. 2017, om 14:46 heeft James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com> het volgende
geschreven:
> I will attend.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On 7 Dec 201
session.
Should this not be enough we can also request the ad-hoc conference room for an
additional work session.
Please start thinking about agenda items and let us know what you think before
next friday when scheduling is due.
regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6
week, after which we will push
harder ;-).
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
regext mailing list
regext
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-07 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/
___
regext
have set up a pre-approvel for a draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00
document name.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 13 dec. 2017, om 14:44 heeft Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl> het volgende
geschreven:
&g
:
Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 101, London, UK, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
*
Session I, Work session.
Monday 2018-03-19 17:40 - 18:40
Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts (Roger Carney
Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 103, Bankok, Thailand, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
*
Tuesday, November 6th, 16:10-18:10, Boromphimarn 4
1. Welcome and Introductions (4 minutes)
i. Jabber scribe
Antoin Verschuren has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-09
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll
I personally think it does too. At least I wrote the text to include those
documents in scope.
But since I’m not a native english speaker it would help to know if others read
that text the same way too.
And confirm it’s not too broad in scope too.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB
before Februari 1st so we will be in time for the
deadline to request one or two sessions.
Let us know what you think.
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
___
regext mailing list
regext
, be a
document shepherd, etc.
This call for adoption ends 25 Januari 2019.
If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the
chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
to contribute text, review, be a
document shepherd, etc.
This call for adoption ends 25 Januari 2019.
If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the
chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren
text, review, be a
document shepherd, etc.
This call for adoption ends 25 Januari 2019.
If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the
chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6
, be a
document shepherd, etc.
This call for adoption ends 25 Januari 2019.
If there are no objections, and we receive enough consensus for adoption, the
chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen
ee that that
may be in scope by the text that you propose and that that would be undesirable?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
, start preparing ;-)
Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 104, Prague, Czech Republic, Agenda
Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren
Mailinglist: regext@ietf.org
*
Monday, March 25th, 13:50-15:50, Berlin/Brussels
1. Welcome and Introductions (4
will try to reduce the time spent on item 4 and 2 as much as
possible.
So who is willing to lead these discussions?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 26 feb. 2019, om 01:48 heeft Andrew Newton het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> If there ar
guidelines…..
That only the individual itself can order this reverse search to be done is
policy, not technical.
That’s why RDAP has the concept of federated access. To be able to comply to
that sort of policies of who can do what.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31
:
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-00
The chairs have already pre-approved this document so once submitted it will be
automaticaly accepted as a WG document.
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 18 jan. 2019,
-regext-login-security-00
The chairs have already pre-approved this document so once submitted it will be
automaticaly accepted as a WG document.
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 18 jan. 2019, om 17:04 heeft Ant
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 18 jan. 2019, om 17:04 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed on the mailinglist, we have selected 5 documents that people
> most want to be added
:
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-00
The chairs have already pre-approved this document so once submitted it will be
automaticaly accepted as a WG document.
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 18 jan. 2019, om
-regext-rdap-openid-00
The chairs have already pre-approved this document so once submitted it will be
automaticaly accepted as a WG document.
Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 18 jan. 2019, om 17:03 heeft Ant
the standard way of
bundling. Hence the informational status of the document and the Registrant
should be in the IANA registration as mandated bij RFC 7451.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
___
regext mai
and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 7 jun. 2019, om 15:13 heeft IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by James Galvin, a
> Chair
?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 14 jun. 2019, om 16:05 heeft Gould, James het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Antoin,
>
> There are no known open items remaining with
> draft-ietf-regext-login-security, so I encourage the WG to rev
work items.
If anyone objects to this decision, then please send a message to the list
before May 2nd so we can update the milestone list next week.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 376
they want to attend where they are a key speaker or participant.
So if you have any specific conflicts with other WG’s, please reply to this
message, and list the WG’s that you need to attend.
Please reply before September 27th so we have time to schedule.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin
Yes Barry, I agree. Not everybody understands the background why it is an
informational document and what it’s purpose is.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 27 sep. 2019, om 17:29 heeft Barry Leiba het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> This is incorrect according to RFC4741, and I have replied to the SecDir
> review on the list that it is as well.
> Section 2.2.1. of RFC4741 states:
This should be RFC 7451 of course. Don’t know where that cut and paste went
wrong ;-)
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672
r the IESG, since they mostly
review standards track documents as output from the REGEXT working group, but
this is one of the few exceptions that is deliberately an informational
document.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 26 sep. 2019, om 06:17 he
Reminder.
We need support for this 2nd WGLC too folks.
So can the respondents of the first WGLC confirm nothing essential has changed?
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 26 okt. 2019, om 12:19 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende gesc
Folks,
We did not receive any response to this second WGLC.
This means we cannot submit this document for publication.
We will extend this second WGLC with 2 weeks, ending November 22nd.
Please respond with +1 if you want this document published gents!
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
is in less than 4 weeks!
Please reply to the list or to the chairs if you want to be on the agenda that
is due in 2 weeks.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 13 sep. 2019, om 15:30 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
these documents and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is
sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying to
this message on the list.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 13 March 2020.
Please
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 13 March 2020.
Please review
Dear WG,
IETF 107 is approaching, so it is time to set up our agenda.
This is a request to send the chairs any items you wish to discuss in
Vancouver.
Please be aware that we will have a 2 hour meeting slot on the Friday morning
in Vancouver.
Remote participation and presentation will be
and Scott and make sure
their comments are addressed?
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 14 feb. 2020, om 16:01 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as a
this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
This is a formal adoption request for Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Unhandled Namespaces:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT, and comment to the list,
This is a formal adoption request for Registry Maintenance Notifications for
the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT, and comment to
depending on the registry’s policy, until the
registrants have found a new registrar to represent them at the registry.
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 21 jan. 2020, om 14:51 heeft Mario Loffredo
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
-maintenance
We have pre-approved the publication of this draft as a WG document.
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
> Op 8 feb. 2020, om 05:53 heeft Joseph Yee het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> +1
>
> -Joseph
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:51 AM Antoin Verschuren <mai
ntoin and Jim
>
>
>
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 2:28, Patrick Mevzek wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, at 09:51, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>>> This is a formal adoption request for Extensible Provisioning Protocol
>>> (EPP) Secure Authorizatio
r
> your comments and let you know we’re leaning towards interpreting your
> message as a no objection.
>
> Would you like to clarify your position?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoin and Jim
>
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 2:10, Patrick Mevzek wrote:
>
&
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as an Informational document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 28 February 2020.
Please review this
have any topics to discuss?
Regards,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
Gustavo,
I see that you have changed the Registrant contact in version 7 to "IETF
".
It should however be: "IESG "
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 7 apr. 2020, om 21:13 heeft Gustavo Lozano het
> volgende geschre
15:43 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/
&
15:43 heeft Antoin Verschuren het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-pagi
hreven:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 9:37 AM
>> To: regext
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-yee-regext-simple-
>> registration-reporting
>>
>
Dear working group,
We will soon have a slot available in our milestone list for a new EPP/Registry
document.
The chairs are not aware of any outstanding adoption requests other than this
one.
This is a formal adoption request for Simple Registration Reporting:
Dear working group,
Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
requests for adoption:
This is a formal adoption request for Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
Query Format:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis/
Please
Dear working group,
Now that we have 2 more RDAP slots available on our milestones, we had new
requests for adoption:
This is a formal adoption request for JSON Responses for the Registration Data
Access Protocol (RDAP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis/
Hi all,
In response to the discussion started by Jim on thoughts for a virtual meeting
in the absence of the in person meeting in Vancouver, the chairs had responses
that most people would like to have a virtual meeting to discuss the newly
adopted documents and existing work.
The IESG has
<mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Mario
>>
>> Il 08/05/2020 15:36, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
>> > Dear working group,
>> >
>> > We will soon have a slot available in our milestone list for a new
>> &
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020.
Please review this
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to
the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/
This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020.
Please review this
Hi all,
This is a call for agenda items for the IETF 109 virtual meeting.
The chairs plan to request a meeting slot, but we would like to know how long a
session is needed..
A special note to authors of newly adopted or an active draft on our milestones
list:
If you want your document to
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
