On Wed, Jan 31, 2018, at 18:11, Gould, James wrote:
> Yes, there is no great solution to the problem of including extensions
> (object or command-response) in poll messages to clients that don’t
> support the extension as indicated by their login services. So, to
> clarifying for the list,
gineer
> jgo...@verisign.com
>
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
>
> *From: *regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Martin Casanova
> <martin.casan...@switch.ch>
> *Da
switch.ch>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:14 AM
To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt
Hi
Thank you for the new version 07 of the draft-ietf-regext-change-poll.
May I ask a question about
Hi
Thank you for the new version 07 of the draft-ietf-regext-change-poll.
May I ask a question about it?
"RFC5730 states: The element MAY contain an OPTIONAL
element that contains one or more elements that
identify object extensions to be used during the session."
The extension should be
Hi,
I published the revised draft-ietf-regext-change-poll based on the feedback
received during the WGLC. Please provide any additional feedback on the list.
Thanks,
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
