More for the WG/Chairs than Gavin or Rick
I think this document is ready for WGLC - are there any reasons why it
should not be?
thanks
tim
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 11:23 AM Rick Wilhelm wrote:
> Gavin, et al,
>
>
>
> I’m good with the handlings that you describe below.
>
>
>
> That includes
Gavin, et al,
I’m good with the handlings that you describe below.
That includes the item in 3.2, I grok your point about the supplied TTL values
already needing to conform to EPP server policy.
And the various rewordings (1.2.1.2 and 1.2.1.2.1) also look good.
Thanks,
Rick
From: Gavin
Hi Rick, thanks for sharing your feedback, my responses are below.
> On 8 Apr 2024, at 15:52, Rick Wilhelm
> wrote:
>
> Gavin, et al,
> This is a mixture of nits and wording things. I had provided this privately
> to Gavin, he indicated it was better to just send directly to the list.
>
